logo资料库

论文研究 - 电偶极子相互作用力随距离和电势定律形式的变化.pdf

第1页 / 共10页
第2页 / 共10页
第3页 / 共10页
第4页 / 共10页
第5页 / 共10页
第6页 / 共10页
第7页 / 共10页
第8页 / 共10页
资料共10页,剩余部分请下载后查看
Analysis of Electrical Dipoles Interaction Forces as a Function of the Distance and of the Form of Electrical Force Law
Abstract
Keywords
1. Observations about Actual Explanation for the Absence of Electrical Interactions at Long Distances
2. Our New Hypothesis and Principles, Concerning the Dipole Interactions at Long Distances
2.1. Justification of Introducing the Two New Principles of Electric Dipoles Interaction, OR and AT
2.2. Presentation and Justification of OR Principle
2.3. Presentation and Justification of AT Principle
3. Conclusions and Consequences
Conflicts of Interest
References
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2018, 6, 1886-1895 http://www.scirp.org/journal/jamp ISSN Online: 2327-4379 ISSN Print: 2327-4352 Analysis of Electrical Dipoles Interaction Forces as a Function of the Distance and of the Form of Electrical Force Law Ioan Has1, Simona Miclaus1, Aurelian Has2 1Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Rm. Valcea, Romania 2Independent Researcher, Rm. Valcea, Romania How to cite this paper: Has, I., Miclaus, S. and Has, A. (2018) Analysis of Electrical Dipoles Interaction Forces as a Function of the Distance and of the Form of Electrical Force Law. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 6, 1886-1895. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2018.69160 Received: August 20, 2018 Accepted: September 17, 2018 Published: September 20, 2018 Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access Abstract Here, we initially introduced and demonstrated two principles: orientation OR principle and attraction AT principle of electrical dipoles. The OR prin- ciple stipulates that any two electrical dipoles P1A, P1B, from two bodies A and B, at any distance in the free state each, will be reciprocally oriented pa- rallel and in the same sense if the electrical interaction forces F between them are of decreasing type with distance r. If the electrical interaction forces F are of increasing type with distance, the two dipoles will be reciprocally oriented parallel but on the opposite sense. The AT principle stipulate that any two electrical dipoles P1A, P1B, at any distance in the free state each, will present always a reciprocal force of attraction FD in both cases of orientation accor- dingly to OR principle in case of any type of electrical force F decreasing or increasing with distance. These findings may complete our previous work where we found that FD force, between two electrical dipoles P1A, P1B consi- dered at atomic and nuclear level, is in fact the actual gravitation Newton force FN. The paper must be considered together with this work for more consistency. Keywords Electrical Forces, Completed Coulomb’s Law, Electric Dipoles Interactions, Torsion Moment of Orientation, Attraction Force between Two Dipoles Is Gravitation 1. Observations about Actual Explanation for the Absence of Electrical Interactions at Long Distances Today, it is largely admitted that at long distances, at astronomical scales, at DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.69160 Sep. 20, 2018 1886 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics
I. Has et al. planetary scale and even at building scales, the electrical forces FC given by clas- sical Coulomb’s law of electrical forces: kq q 1 2 2 r ; with k = 1/4πε0; (1), (1’) q q 1 2 r 4π ε 0 = F C = 2 between two neutral bodies are negligible and should not be taken into account, as it happens today. The only forces considered today at such long distances are the gravitational forces FN given by classical Newton’s law. F N = − G Mm 2 r (2) This affirmation excludes the electromagnetic phenomena which consist of more complex combinations of electric and magnetic forces originated at atomic scales. But it is unlikely that the interaction forces acting between two electrical charges q1, q2 may be perfectly described by mathematical simple laws as in (1), at any distances r, and of any scales, in the micro and macro universe. At this point of our analysis, the above affirmation is justified by the reality complexity or its infinity and also by discrepancies between calculus results of actual simple laws from (1), (2) and some experimental measurements and ob- servations concerning these forces, reported in the past. Discrepancies concerning the Coulomb’s law are confirmed by modern expe- riments, which allow scientists to conclude that in the case of very short dis- tances (such as between molecules, atoms, nuclei, particles) the law (1) is not precisely correct [1], but also it has not yet been proven in the case of long dis- tances [2]. In such circumstances, we can conclude that the Coulomb’s law in the current form (1) is not perfect and that it can be improved. For a more accurate description of the infinite reality, including ether pres- ence which will be considered throughout this paper, as we previously demon- strated [3] [4] [5] [6], the most appropriate (but not singular mathematical) mode of electrical forces description, will be probable, a long or infinite series of successive powers of the 1/r distance. In the present, it is accepted that macroscopic bodies have a random distribu- tion of +q and –q charges, which will generate a random distribution of dipoles in any direction, and all coefficients ki from (3) are canceled [7]. φ M = k k 1 r ε ε 0 0 0 r + + 2 k 2 r ε 0 3 + (3) This means that starting from small distances from any neutral body to infi- nite distances, the influence of the electric charges from that body is considered today to be null. But we will show below that this approach isn’t correctly justi- fied. 1887 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.69160
I. Has et al. DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.69160 2. Our New Hypothesis and Principles, Concerning the Dipole Interactions at Long Distances 2.1. Justification of Introducing the Two New Principles of Electric Dipoles Interaction, OR and AT Despite the fact that bodies A, B…, are neutral, the +q and –q charges are in fact always separated in space at atomic and nuclear scale, and consequently every charge +q or –q will exert its electrical interaction force FC to infinite distance according to (1) or to a corrected Coulomb law as in [8] [9] [10] [11]. So in nature practically all the matter must be regarded as being organized al- ways as electrical dipoles P1, P2, P3… as result of Coulomb law action even at smallest scales. We will show next, that neglecting electrical forces and their potential even for distant bodies is not correct because we can admit and demonstrate the follow- ing two principles: a) OR principle of the reciprocal orientation of distant dipoles. b) AT principle of the permanent attraction of oriented distant dipoles. 2.2. Presentation and Justification of OR Principle In order to demonstrate the OR principle, we can calculate the torsion moments +M (clockwise) and −M (counterclockwise) created by an oriented dipole P2 from body B upon an un-oriented dipole P1 (disposed at 90˚ in body A). In this situation (Figure 1) we can distinguish two cases, depending on the variation mode with distance r, of interaction Coulomb’s forces F (reference frame xOy is attached to A body). Case 1a). of decreasing F forces. Firstly, for this calculus, we suppose the inte- raction forces Fa (attraction for +q/−q charges when Fa < 0, according to (1)) and Fr (rejection for +q/+q or –q/−q charges, Fr > 0, according to (1)) between elec- trical charges +q and –q as being some vectors F of central orientation de- creasing with the increasing distance r l , between body A and body B ac- cording to the law of the general type (4), generalizing (1), with n a natural number: F = q q 1 2 r 4π ε 0 n = kq q A B n r (4) including the simple case n = 1: F = kq q A B r (4a) Product qA.qB from (4), (4a) comprises for simplicity, also coefficients k/4πε0. Utilizing (4a), we obtained from Figure 1 the clockwise torsion moment +M and counterclockwise −M moment, given upon P1 dipole, by forces F from P2 di- pole, as follows: M F = l 2 = ( m q q A B ) (5) 1888 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics
I. Has et al. Figure 1. Situation of two distant dipoles P1 and P2 from bodies A and B, which manifest a reciprocal orientation with xOy frame attached to A body. where function m represents the components of total M moments, given by var- ious pairs of q charges. + − M m q q A B = ( + ) + ( − − m q q A B ) = 2 kq       1 l + r    .    l 2    2 +    1 l + r    .    l 2       2 = 2 kq 2 l + r l . 2 2 = 2 kq l l + r 2 + + M m q q A B = ( − ) + ( − + m q q A B ) = 2 kq       1 l − r    .    l 2    2 +    1 l − r    .    l 2       2 = 2 kq 2 l − r l . 2 2 = 2 kq l l − r 2 (6) (7) The ratio rM of the two moments results from (6) and (7): r M = + − M M = 2 kq 2 kq l l r + l l r − r r = r r − + l l 2 1; < →→ − 2 M > + M ; (8) This result of M moments ratio rM indicates that the orientation of dipole P1 will be in the same sense/direction as dipole P2, in this case of the decreasing positive forces F. Case 1b). of decreasing F forces and sign change. We now must calculate what happens in the hypothetical case when the forces F from (4) and (4a) will change the sign from positive +F to negative −F forces, including the simple case n = 1: F = − kq q A B r (9) In this modified Case 1b), we admit hypothetically, an inversion of the actual physical rule (attraction force –Fa between +q and –q charges), becoming repul- sion force +Fr between +q and –q charges and attraction force –Fa between +q and +q or between –q and –q charges. In this modified Case 1b) the Equations (6) and (7) becomes, considering the same senses of rotation of +M and –M moments, as in Figure 1: 1889 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.69160
I. Has et al. + − ) = 2 kq       − 1 l − r    .    l 2    2 + −    1 l − r    .    l 2       2 + + M m q q A B = + ( ( = − kq 2 r = − kq 2 r ) 2 l − ) 2 l + ( − + m q q A B l ⋅ = − 2 2 ( − − m q q A B l . 2 2 = − kq 2 l l − r 2 kq 2 l l + r 2 + − M m q q A B = + ) = 2 kq       − 1 l + r    .    l 2    2 + −    1 l + r    .    l 2       2 (10) (11) The ratio rM of the two moments results: r M = + − M M = 2 − kq 2 − kq l l r + l l r − r r = r r − + l l 2 1; < →→ − 2 M > + M ; (12) This result of the M moments ratio rM indicates that the orientation of dipole P1 is in the same sense/direction as dipole P2, also in the case of inverse sign of decreasing forces F (as in Case 1a). of decreasing actual forces F). So we conclude that changing the sign of F force, have no influence upon the orientation rule of dipoles P1 and P2. Case 2a). of increasing F forces. Secondly, for this calculus, we suppose the in- teraction force Fa (attraction) and Fr (rejection) between electrical charges q as being some vectors of central orientation increasing with the distance r l , according to the laws of the general type (13), with n a natural number: F k q 1 = A ⋅ q B n ⋅ r (13) including the simple case n = 1 or the limit power case of lnr, in both cases F force increasing with r: F k q 1 = A ⋅ q r B or F k q 1 = A ⋅ q B ln r (13a),(13b) Utilizing (13b) we obtain from Figure 1:    + − M m q q A B ( − − m q q A B k q 1 + = = ) + ( ) 2 = 2 k q 1 2 r +    l 2    l ⋅ = 2 2 k q 1 r +    + + M m q q A B = ( ) + ( − + m q q A B ) = 2 k q 1 − = 2 k q 1 2 r −    l 2    l ⋅ = 2 2 k q 1 r    −    l 2       l 2 l 2   ⋅     l 2    +    r + l 2   ⋅     l 2       (14) l 2   ⋅     l 2    +    r − l 2   ⋅     l 2       (15) r + ⋅ l    r − ⋅ l    The ratio rM of the two moments results: r M = + − M M = 2 k q 1 2 k q 1 r r       l +  2  l   2  − ⋅ l ⋅ l = r + r − l 2 l 2 > →→ + 1; M > − M ; (16) 1890 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.69160
I. Has et al. This result of M moments ratio rM indicates that the orientation of dipole P1 is in the opposite sense/direction as dipole P2, in case of increasing positive forces. In Case 2b), of increasing F forces and sign change, when the force F is also as increasing with r type, but of reversed sign, is similar to the Case 1b). And hence the result of the calculus of rM ratio will be similar: indicating that the orienta- tion of dipole P1 is in the opposite sense/direction as dipole P2. (as in Case 1b). in this case of increasing positive forces F. And so at points Case 1) and Case 2), the OR principle was demonstrated. The OR principle stipulate that in case of decreasing electrical forces F with r the orientation of dipole P1 is in the same sense/direction as dipole P2 irrespec- tive of sign of F. But in case of increasing electrical forces F with r, the orientation of dipole P1 is in the opposite sense/direction as dipole P2 irrespective of sign of F. 2.3. Presentation and Justification of AT Principle In order to demonstrate the AT principle, will be calculated forwards the resul- tant force R, appearing between two oriented dipoles, P1A and P1B, according to OR principle, given by forces of attraction Fa and by forces of repulsion Fr exist- ing between +q and –q charges, as in actual FC or completed F, Coulomb’s law. It must determine if the force R is the attraction or repulsion force, as a function of the form of the electric force law F. The situation of two dipoles P1A and P1B originated in A body and in B body respectively, identically oriented and equal to each other, with polar moment value r = q∙l, is presented in Figure 2. The two possible cases of the F force vari- ation with the distance r between two electric charges will be analyzed below: Case 1) the decreasing variation and Case 2) the increasing variation of F force with r. But we must remind that first calculus concerning the attraction force Fa and the rejection force Fr between two farther electrical dipoles was performed by us in [8] [11], but without presenting there the significance of the result of that calculus, consisting in the sign of resultant force R. Also there in [8] [11], was made a simplification of calculus by introducing a substitution: α = kqAqB. But here we will emphases that such result, will conduct at a new important principle, the AT principle of permanent attraction of electric dipole, described firstly here below. In order to better understand the origin of AT principle we will resume here without the above substitution, the calculus of forces Fa and of Fr from [8] [11] performed in the two cases, Case 1 and Case 2, of the F force variation with the distance r. Case 1). of decreasing F forces. Firstly, we suppose the interaction force Fa (at- traction) and Fr (rejection) between electrical charges +q and –q as being some vectors of central orientation decreasing with the distance r l , according to the laws of the general type, from Equations (4) or (4a). 1891 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.69160
I. Has et al. Figure 2. Forces F acting between a pair of identical oriented dipoles P1A and P1B con- sidered at atomic and nuclear level, from A and B bodies with xOy frame attached to A body. From Figure 2, we now can calculate directly by simple algebra, utilizing Eq- uation (4b), the total force upon each dipole, exerted by the other dipole. Here in calculus, we consider the + sign for force values having the sense of real force as in Figure 2, which corresponds to the attraction force Fa (Fa < 0) and to repul- sion force Fr (Fr > 0), forces exerted by the charges +q, −q, as in Coulomb law (4). From Figure 2 notating – A q , we consider first, the forces exerted upon P1A dipole by a P1B dipole. Utilizing the simple case (4b) the resultant forces Fa and Fr values results as follows: q−→ and having − + q q A B + − q q A B = A F A = A F a 1 + A F a 2 = − + kq q A B r + + − kq q A B l r 2 + = − + kq q A B r 2 ( r r + + l 2 l 2 ) (17) F R = F r A 1 + F r A 2 = − − kq q A B r l + + + + kq q A B r l + = 2 − − kq q A B 1 + ) l ( r (18) If we rewrite the expression from the denominator from (17), one obtains: ( r r From (19) and admitting r ) l ( r + = + l 2 )2 l it results: ( r r + l 2 + ( r < ) 2 − (19) l )2 l (20) Introducing (20) in (17) and comparing with (18) it results: F a = + − kq q A B r 2 ( r r + + l 2 l 2 − − kq q A B r 2 ( r l 2 + )2 l + = F r (21) > ) F> r (22) From (22) it results that in the case of forces F of the type as in Equations (4), (4b) decreasing (n = +1) with the r distance, the attraction force Fa will be great- F a DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.69160 1892 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics
I. Has et al. er than the repulsion force Fr and finally an attraction force Ra = Fa − Fr > 0 be- tween the two identically oriented dipoles P1A, P1B results. This result is correct even if the power of r is any n > 1, as can easily be demonstrated. Case 2) of increasing F forces. Let’s suppose the force F increases with the dis- tance r, including a law of the form (13b). q = ⋅ F k q 1 (23) with coefficient k1 being similar with coefficient k from Equation (4a) but having the appropriate measure units considering that the term lnr must be adimen- sional. ln r A B Again from Figure 2, for identically oriented dipoles P1A, P1B (Figure 2), the total forces upon P1A dipole utilizing (23) will be: l 2 ln ln + − k q q A B 1 − + k q q A B 1 A F a 2 A F a 1 F a = ( r r + + = + ) = − + k q q A B 1 ln ( r r   + l 2 F r = F r A 1 + F r A 2 = − − k q q A B 1 ln ( r ) + + l + + k q q A B 1 ln ( r + ) l = − − k q q A B 1 ln ( r + l )  (24)  )2 (25) Comparing F and Fr from Equations (24) and (25), and considering Equation (20) it results: F a = − + k q q A B 1 ln ( r r   + l 2 )   < − − k q q A B 1 ln ( r + )2 l = F r (26) F a F< r (27) From (27) it results that in the case of increasing F forces of the type from (23), the repulsion force Fr between two identically oriented dipoles P1A, P1B, will be greater than the attractive force Fa and the resultant force Rr = Fr − Fa > 0, will be a repulsion force. This result is correct even if the increasing variation has the general form F = α'rn with n > 1, as it can easily be demonstrated. But in this Case 2 of increasing F forces (23), the natural orientation of two dipoles becomes reverted compared with those from Figure 2, according to the OR principle from Section 2.2., and the interaction force between the two di- poles P1A and P1B will be again an attraction force Ra = Fr − Fa < 0 as for de- creasing forces. So, the AT principle stipulate that in case of decreasing electrical forces F with r an attraction force Ra between the two identically naturally oriented dipoles P1A, P1B results. Also in case of increasing electrical forces F with r, because the two dipoles P1A, P1B will be naturally inverse oriented accordingly to OR principle, AT principle stipulate that again an attraction force Ra between the two dipoles P1A, P1B results. And so, the simultaneous action of OR principle and of AT principle, will give birth of a permanent attraction between two any electrical dipoles irrespective of F force type. The above analytical calculus and its results, yields the above OR principle and AT principle, whose result must be real. This effect of permanent attraction of electrical dipoles P1A, P1B can be ob- served also in case of a group in any number of usual magnets mi as spheres of 1893 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.69160
分享到:
收藏