Dear Editor, Thank you for handling the process of our manuscript (VT-2019-03538). We would also like to thank the two reviewers for their detailed comments on our work which helped us improving the quality of this manuscript. Then, Unfortunately, you give comments:” After careful consideration of the reviewers' comments, the decision has been made not to publish this paper in the IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. Please note that we do not accept submissions of a revised manuscript based on this rejected paper.” we cannot accept this result. we hope the reasons will change your mind and give us a second opportunity. Firstly, the first reviewer's opinion tended to be negative. However, it only cited some problems in the article, and did not give an opinion of rejection, the most opinions given by him can be modified and improved. While the opinion of the second reviewer was clearly positive. It shows that the reviewers agree with the innovation and contribution of the article, there are still some minor issues. But we all have the opportunity and ability to modify. Second, for this comment “The innovation and contribution are not significant enough to be a Transaction paper”. We argue that this paper has enough contribution and novelty. In order to illustrate the contribution and novelty of this paper, we survey the existing works of VLC/RF, in the following: We found that a few researchers studied the mixed VLC/RF communication systems. they assumed that eavesdropper only exists in the RF link and the PLS for the VLC link was not considered. However, the security problem in VLC systems is still a risk due to the broadcast characteristics. Motivated by the above background, we consider the PLS for the mixed RF/VLC relaying systems where eavesdropping happens in both VLC and RF links. Furthermore, we assume that the direct links from the source to the legitimate user and the eavesdropper are not blocked. We discuss the PLS performance of existing Mixed RF/VLC Cooperative Relaying Systems. What is more, optical wireless communication with EH has not been studying well. In our paper, the cooperative relay has the energy collection ability and can extract the direct current part existing in the visible-light signal. Then, the relay uses the collected energy to demodulate the received visible-light signal and retransmit it through the radio frequency link. Following that, the contribution and novelty of this paper is illustrated. Based on those two reasons above, we believe that the results are of merit and the paper is potentially publishable in the journal. We would be most grateful if you could reconsider our work and give us a second opportunity. Thank you very much for your patience and understanding. Looking forward to hearing from you. With best regards, Yours sincerely,