logo资料库

Nonlinear Optics.pdf

第1页 / 共92页
第2页 / 共92页
第3页 / 共92页
第4页 / 共92页
第5页 / 共92页
第6页 / 共92页
第7页 / 共92页
第8页 / 共92页
资料共92页,剩余部分请下载后查看
Nonlinear Opt 4. Nonlinear Optics 157 P a r t A 4 This chapter provides a brief introduction into the basic nonlinear-optical phenomena and discusses some of the most significant recent advances and breakthroughs in nonlinear optics, as well as novel applications of nonlinear-optical processes and devices. Nonlinear optics is the area of optics that studies the interaction of light with matter in the regime where the response of the material system to the applied electromagnetic field is nonlinear in the amplitude of this field. At low light intensities, typical of non-laser sources, the properties of materials remain independent of the intensity of illumination. The superposition principle holds true in this regime, and light waves can pass through materials or be reflected from boundaries and interfaces without interacting with each other. Laser sources, on the other hand, can provide sufficiently high light intensities to modify the optical properties of materials. Light waves can then interact with each other, exchanging momentum and energy, and the superposition principle is no longer valid. This interaction of light waves can result in the generation of optical fields at new frequencies, including optical harmonics of incident radiation or sum- or difference-frequency signals. 4.1 Nonlinear Polarization and Nonlinear Susceptibilities ............... 159 4.2 Wave Aspects of Nonlinear Optics ........... 160 4.3 Second-Order Nonlinear Processes ......... 161 4.3.1 Second-Harmonic Generation........ 161 4.3.2 Sum- and Difference-Frequency Generation and Parametric Amplification............................... 163 4.4 Third-Order Nonlinear Processes ............ 164 4.4.1 Self-Phase Modulation ................. 165 4.4.2 Temporal Solitons......................... 166 4.4.3 Cross-Phase Modulation ............... 167 4.4.4 Self-Focusing............................... 167 4.4.5 Four-Wave Mixing........................ 169 4.4.6 Optical Phase Conjugation ............. 169 4.4.7 Optical Bistability and Switching .... 170 4.4.8 Stimulated Raman Scattering......... 172 4.4.9 Third-Harmonic Generation by Ultrashort Laser Pulses.............. 173 4.5 Ultrashort Light Pulses in a Resonant Two-Level Medium: Self-Induced Transparency and the Pulse Area Theorem .................. 178 4.5.1 Interaction of Light with Two-Level Media .................. 178 4.5.2 The Maxwell and Schrödinger Equations for a Two-Level Medium 178 4.5.3 Pulse Area Theorem ...................... 180 4.5.4 Amplification of Ultrashort Light Pulses in a Two-Level Medium ................ 181 4.5.5 Few-Cycle Light Pulses in a Two-Level Medium ................ 183 4.6 Let There be White Light: Supercontinuum Generation.................. 185 4.6.1 Self-Phase Modulation, Four-Wave Mixing, and Modulation Instabilities in Supercontinuum-Generating Photonic-Crystal Fibers ................. 185 4.6.2 Cross-Phase-Modulation-Induced Instabilities ................................. 187 4.6.3 Solitonic Phenomena in Media with Retarded Optical Nonlinearity. 189 4.7 Nonlinear Raman Spectroscopy .............. 193 The Basic Principles ...................... 194 4.7.1 4.7.2 Methods of Nonlinear Raman Spectroscopy ............................... 196 4.7.3 Polarization Nonlinear Raman Techniques .................................. 199 4.7.4 Time-Resolved Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering........ 201 4.8 Waveguide Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering ................................. 202 4.8.1 Enhancement of Waveguide CARS in Hollow Photonic-Crystal Fibers... 202
158 Part A Basic Principles and Materials P a r t A 4 4.8.2 Four-Wave Mixing and CARS in Hollow-Core Photonic-Crystal Fibers ......................................... 205 4.9 Nonlinear Spectroscopy with Photonic-Crystal-Fiber Sources....... 209 4.9.1 Wavelength-Tunable Sources and 4.11 High-Order Harmonic Generation .......... 219 4.11.1 Historical Background ................... 219 4.11.2 High-Order-Harmonic Generation in Gases ...................................... 220 4.11.3 Microscopic Physics ...................... 222 4.11.4 Macroscopic Physics...................... 225 Progress in Nonlinear Spectroscopy 209 4.12 Attosecond Pulses: 4.9.2 Photonic-Crystal Fiber Frequency Shifters ....................................... 210 4.9.3 Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Spectroscopy with PCF Sources .......................... 211 4.9.4 Pump-Probe Nonlinear Absorption Spectroscopy using Chirped Frequency-Shifted Light Pulses from a Photonic-Crystal Fiber ........ 213 4.10 Surface Nonlinear Optics, Spectroscopy, Measurement and Application ............... 227 4.12.1 Attosecond Pulse Trains and Single Attosecond Pulses......... 227 4.12.2 Basic Concepts for XUV Pulse Measurement ........... 227 4.12.3 The Optical-Field-Driven XUV Streak Camera Technique ........................ 230 4.12.4 Applications of Sub-femtosecond XUV Pulses: Time-Resolved Spectroscopy of Atomic Processes ... 234 4.12.5 Some Recent Developments........... 236 and Imaging ........................................ 216 References .................................................. 236 Although the observation of most nonlinear-optical phenomena requires laser radiation, some classes of nonlinear-optical effects were known long before the invention of the laser. The most prominent examples of such phenomena include Pockels and Kerr electrooptic effects [4.1], as well as light-induced resonant absorp- tion saturation, described by Vavilov [4.2, 3]. It was, however, only with the advent of lasers that systematic studies of optical nonlinearities and the observation of a vast catalog of spectacular nonlinear-optical phenom- ena became possible. In the first nonlinear-optical experiment of the laser era, performed by Franken et al. in 1961 [4.4], a ruby- laser radiation with a wavelength of 694.2 nm was used to generate the second harmonic in a quartz crys- tal at the wavelength of 347.1 nm. This seminal work was followed by the discovery of a rich diversity of nonlinear-optical effects, including sum-frequency generation, stimulated Raman scattering, self-focusing, optical rectification, four-wave mixing, and many others. While in the pioneering work by Franken the efficiency of second-harmonic generation (SHG) was on the or- −8, optical frequency doublers created by early der of 10 1963 provided 20%–30% efficiency of frequency con- version [4.5, 6]. The early phases of the development and the basic principles of nonlinear optics have been reviewed in the most illuminating way in the classi- cal books by Bloembergen [4.7] and Akhmanov and Khokhlov [4.8], published in the mid 1960s. Over the following four decades, the field of nonlin- ear optics has witnessed an enormous growth, leading to the observation of new physical phenomena and giv- ing rise to novel concepts and applications. A systematic introduction into these effects along with a comprehen- sive overview of nonlinear-optical concepts and devices can be found in excellent textbooks by Shen [4.9], Boyd [4.1], Butcher and Cotter [4.10], Reintjes [4.11] and others. One of the most recent up-to-date reviews of the field of nonlinear optics with an in-depth discussion of the fundamental physics underlying nonlinear-optical interactions was provided by Flytzanis [4.12]. This chapter provides a brief introduction into the main nonlinear-optical phenomena and discusses some of the most significant recent advances in nonlinear optics, as well as novel applications of nonlinear-optical processes and devices.
Nonlinear Optics 4.1 Nonlinear Polarization and Nonlinear Susceptibilities 159 4.1 Nonlinear Polarization and Nonlinear Susceptibilities Nonlinear-optical effects belong to a broader class of electromagnetic phenomena described within the gen- eral framework of macroscopic Maxwell equations. The Maxwell equations not only serve to identify and classify nonlinear phenomena in terms of the relevant nonlinear- optical susceptibilities or, more generally, nonlinear terms in the induced polarization, but also govern the nonlinear-optical propagation effects. We assume the absence of extraneous charges and currents and write the set of Maxwell equations for the electric, E(r, t), and magnetic, H(r, t), fields in the form , (4.1) (4.2) (4.3) ∇ × E = − 1 ∂ B ∂t c ∇ × B = 1 ∂ D ∂t c ∇ · D = 0 , ∇ · B = 0 . , t D = E+ 4π Here, B = H+ 4π M, where M is the magnetic dipole polarization, c is the speed of light, and (4.4) J(ζ)dζ , −∞ (4.5) where J is the induced current density. Generally, the equation of motion for charges driven by the electromag- netic field has to be solved to define the relation between the induced current J and the electric and magnetic fields. For quantum systems, this task can be fulfilled by solving the Schrödinger equation. In Sect. 4.5 of this chapter, we provide an example of such a self-consistent analysis of nonlinear-optical phenomena in a model two-level system. Very often a phenomenological ap- proach based on the introduction of field-independent or local-field-corrected nonlinear-optical susceptibilities can provide an adequate description of nonlinear-optical processes. Formally, the current density J can be represented as a series expansion in multipoles: (P −∇ · Q)+ c (∇ × M) , J = ∂ ∂t (4.6) where P and Q are the electric dipole and electric quadrupole polarizations, respectively. In the electric dipole approximation, we keep only the first term on the right-hand side of (4.6). In view of (4.5), this gives the following relation between the D, E, and P vectors: D = E+ 4π P. We now represent the polarization P as a sum P = PL + Pnl , (4.8) where PL is the part of the electric dipole polarization linear in the field amplitude and Pnl is the nonlinear part of this polarization. The linear polarization governs linear-optical phe- nomena, i. e., it corresponds to the regime where the optical properties of a medium are independent of the field intensity. The relation between PL and the electric field E is given by the standard formula of linear optics: PL = χ(1)(t − t )dt , )E(t (4.9) where χ(1)(t) is the time-domain linear susceptibility tensor. Representing the field E and polarization PL in the form of elementary monochromatic plane waves, E = E (ω) exp (ikr − ωt)+ c.c. and PL = PL(ω) exp ikr − ωt + c.c. , we take the Fourier transform of (4.9) to find PL(ω) = χ(1)(ω)E(ω) , where χ(1)(ω) = χ(1)(t) exp(iωt)dt . P a r t A 4 . 1 (4.10) (4.11) (4.12) (4.13) In the regime of weak fields, the nonlinear part of the polarization Pnl can be represented as a power-series expansion in the field E: χ(2)(t − t1, t − t2) : E(t1)E(t2)dt1 dt2 Pnl = + χ(3)(t − t1, t − t2, t − t3) ...E(t1)E(t2)E(t3)dt1 dt2 dt3 + . . . , (4.14) where χ(2) and χ(3) are the second- and third-order nonlinear susceptibilities. of plane monochromatic waves, Representing the electric field in the form of a sum E = Ei(ωi) exp(ikir − ωit)+ c.c. , (4.15) i we take the Fourier transform of (4.14) to arrive at (4.7) Pnl(ω) = P(2)(ω)+ P(3)(ω)+ . . . , (4.16)
160 Part A Basic Principles and Materials where P(2)(ω) = χ(2)(ω; ωi , ω j) : E(ωi)E(ω j) , P(3)(ω) = χ(3)(ω; ωi , ω j , ωk) χ(2)(ω; ωi , ω j) = χ(2)(ω = ωi + ω j) = χ(2)(t1, t2) exp[i(ωit1 + ω jt2)]dt1 dt2 ...E(ωi)E(ω j)E(ωk) , (4.17) ω 1, k 1 (4.18) (4.19) ω 2, k 2 (2) ω 3, k 3 is the second-order nonlinear-optical susceptibility and χ(3)(ω; ωi , ω j , ωk) = χ(3)(ω = ωi + ω j + ωk) = χ(3)(t1, t2, t3) exp[i(ωit1 + ω jt2 + ωkt3)]dt1 dt2 dt3 (4.20) P a r t A 4 . 2 is the third-order nonlinear-optical susceptibility. The second-order nonlinear polarization defined by (4.17) gives rise to three-wave mixing processes, optical rectification and linear electrooptic effect. In particular, setting ωi = ω j = ω0 in (4.17) and (4.19), we arrive at ω = 2ω0, which corresponds to second-harmonic generation, controlled by the nonlin- = χ(2)(2ω0; ω0, ω0). In a more ear susceptibility χ(2) SHG general case of three-wave mixing process with ωi = ω1 = ω j = ω2, the second-order polarization de- fined by (4.17) can describe sum-frequency generation (SFG) ωSF = ω1 + ω2 Fig. 4.1 or difference-frequency generation (DFG) ωDF = ω1 − ω2, governed by the 4.2 Wave Aspects of Nonlinear Optics In the electric dipole approximation, the Maxwell equa- tions (4.1–4.4) yield the following equation governing the propagation of light waves in a weakly nonlinear medium: ∇ × (∇ × E)− 1 c2 ∂2 E ∂t2 − 4π c2 ∂2 PL ∂t2 = 4π c2 ∂2 Pnl ∂t2 . (4.21) Fig. 4.1 Sum-frequency generation ω1 + ω2 = ω3 in a me- dium with a quadratic nonlinearity. The case of ω1 = ω2 corresponds to second-harmonic generation = χ(2)(ωSF; ω1, ω2) and nonlinear susceptibilities χ(2) SFG χ(2) DFG = χ(2)(ωDF; ω1,−ω2), respectively. The third-order nonlinear polarization defined by (4.18) is responsible for four-wave mixing (FWM), stimulated Raman scattering, two-photon absorption, and Kerr-effect-related phenomena, including self- phase modulation (SPM) and self-focusing. For the particular case of third-harmonic generation, we set ωi = ω j = ωk = ω0 in (4.18) and (4.20) to obtain ω = 3ω0. This type of nonlinear-optical interaction, in accordance with (4.18) and (4.20), is controlled by = χ(3)(3ω0; ω0, ω0, ω0). the cubic susceptibility χ(3) THG A more general, frequency-nondegenerate case can cor- respond to a general type of an FWM process. These and other basic nonlinear-optical processes will be con- sidered in greater details in the following sections. E (r, t) = Re axis, we represent the field E in (4.21) by eA (z, t) exp (ikz− ωt) and write the nonlinear polarization as ikpz− ωt Pnl (r, t) = Re ep Pnl (z, t) exp , (4.22) (4.23) The nonlinear polarization, appearing on the right-hand side of (4.21), plays the role of a driving source, inducing an electromagnetic wave with the same frequency ω as the nonlinear polarization wave Pnl(r, t). Dynamics of a nonlinear wave process can be then thought as a result of the interference of induced and driving (pump) waves, controlled by the dispersion of the medium. Assuming that the fields have the form of quasi- monochromatic plane waves propagating along the z- where k and A(z, t) are the wave vector and the envelope of the electric field, k p and Pnl(z, t) are the wave vector and the envelope of the polarization wave. If the envelope A(z, t) is a slowly varying func- tion over the wavelength, |∂2 A/∂z2| |k∂A/∂z|, and ∂2 Pnl/∂t2 ≈ −ω2 Pnl, (4.21) is reduced to [4.9] ∂A ∂z + 1 u ∂A ∂t = 2πiω2 kc2 Pnl exp (i∆kz) , (4.24)
where u = (∂k/∂ω)−1 ∆k = kp − k is the wave-vector mismatch. is the group velocity and In the following sections, this generic equation of slowly varying envelope approximation (SVEA) Nonlinear Optics 4.3 Second-Order Nonlinear Processes 161 will be employed to analyze the wave aspects of the basic second- and third-order nonlinear-optical phenomena. 4.3 Second-Order Nonlinear Processes 4.3.1 Second-Harmonic Generation reference with z In second-harmonic generation, a pump wave with a fre- quency of ω generates a signal at the frequency 2ω as it propagates through a medium with a quadratic nonlinearity (Fig. 4.1). Since all even-order nonlinear susceptibilities χ(n) vanish in centrosymmetric me- dia, SHG can occur only in media with no inversion symmetry. Assuming that diffraction and second-order dis- persion effects are negligible, we use (4.24) for a quadratically nonlinear medium with a nonlinear SHG = χ(2) (2ω; ω, ω) to write a pair of susceptibility χ(2) SHG coupled equations for the slowly varying envelopes of the pump and second-harmonic fields A1 = A1(z, t) and A2 = A2(z, t): + 1 u1 + 1 u2 ∗ 1 A2 exp (i∆kz) , 1 exp (−i∆kz) , = iγ1 A = iγ2 A2 ∂A1 ∂z ∂A2 ∂z ∂A1 ∂t ∂A2 ∂t (4.25) (4.26) where γ1 = 2πω2 1 k1c2 χ(2) (ω; 2ω,−ω) and γ2 = 4πω2 1 k2c2 χ(2) SHG (4.28) are the nonlinear coefficients, u1 and u2 are the group velocities of the pump and second-harmonic pulses, respectively, and ∆k = 2k1− k2 is the wave-vector mis- match for the SHG process. If the difference between the group velocities of the pump and second-harmonic pulses can be neglected for a nonlinear medium with a given length and if the in- tensity of the pump field in the process of SHG remains much higher than the intensity of the second-harmonic field, we set u1 = u2 = u and |A1|2 = |A10|2 = const. in (4.25) and (4.26) to derive in the retarded frame of = z and η = t − z/u A2 (L) = iγ2 A2 10 sin i∆kL 2 , (4.29) ∆kL 2 ∆kL 2 L exp where L is the length of the nonlinear medium. The intensity of the second-harmonic field is then given by I2 (L) ∝ γ 2 2 I 2 10 sin ∆kL 2 ∆kL 2 2 L2, (4.30) where I10 is the intensity of the pump field. Second-harmonic intensity I2, as can be seen from (4.30) oscillates as a function of L Fig. 4.2 with a period Lc = π/|∆k| = λ1(4|n1− n2|) −1, where λ1 is the pump wavelength and n1 and n2 are the values of the refractive index at the frequencies of the pump field and its second harmonic, respectively. The parameter Lc, defining the length of the nonlinear medium providing the maximum SHG efficiency, is referred to as the coherence length. P a r t A 4 . 3 Second-harmonic intensity (arb. units) (4.27) 0.4 Lc2 = 2Lc1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 Lc1 1 2 3 4 5 6 L/Lc Fig. 4.2 Second-harmonic intensity as a function of the length L of the nonlinear medium normalized to the coher- ence length Lc for two values of Lc: (dashed line) Lc1 and (solid line) Lc2 = 2Lc1
162 Part A Basic Principles and Materials Although the solution (4.29) describes the simplest regime of SHG, it is very instructive as it visualizes the significance of reducing the wave-vector mismatch ∆k for efficient SHG. Since the wave vectors k1 and k2 are associated with the momenta of the pump and second-harmonic fields, p1 = k1 and p2 = k2, with being the Planck constant, the condition ∆k = 0, known as the phase-matching condition in nonlinear optics, in fact, represents momentum conservation for the SHG process, where two photons of the pump field are requited to generate a single photon of the second harmonic. Several strategies have been developed to solve the phase-matching problem for SHG. The most practi- cally significant solutions include the use of birefringent nonlinear crystals [4.13, 14], quasi-phase-matching in periodically poled nonlinear materials [4.15, 16] and waveguide regimes of nonlinear interactions with the phase mismatch related to the material dispersion com- pensated for by waveguide dispersion [4.7]. Harmonic generation in the gas phase, as demonstrated by Miles and Harris [4.17], can be phase-matched through an optimization of the content of the gas mixture. Fig- ure 4.3 illustrates phase matching in a birefringent crystal. The circle represents the cross section of the refractive-index sphere n0(ω) for an ordinary wave at the pump frequency ω. The ellipse is the cross sec- tion of the refractive-index ellipsoid ne(2ω) for an extraordinary wave at the frequency of the second har- monic 2ω. Phase matching is achieved in the direction where n0ω = ne(2ω), corresponding to an angle θpm with respect to the optical axis c of the crystal in Fig. 4.3. When the phase-matching condition ∆k = 0 is satis- fied, (4.29) and (4.30) predict a quadratic growth of the P a r t A 4 . 3 c θ ηo(ω) ηe(2ω) Fig. 4.3 Phase-matching second-harmonic generation in a birefringent crystal Pump amplitude (arb. units) Second-harmonic amplitude (arb. units) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 1 2 3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 4 z/zsh Fig. 4.4 The amplitudes of the pump and second-harmonic fields as functions of the normalized propagation distance z/zsh with zsh = [γρ10(0)]−1 second-harmonic intensity as a function of the length L of the nonlinear medium. This scaling law holds true, however, only as long as the second-harmonic intensity remains much less than the pump intensity. As |A2| becomes comparable with |A1|, depletion of the pump field has to be taken into consideration. To this end, we introduce the real amplitudes ρ j and phases ϕ j of the pump and second-harmonic fields, , with j = 1, 2. Then, assuming that A j = ρ j exp u1 = u2 = u and γ1 = γ2 = γ , we derive from (4.25) and (4.26) iϕ j ρ1 (η, z) = ρ10 (η) sech [γρ10 (η) z] , ρ2 (η, z) = ρ10 (η) tanh [γρ10 (η) z] . (4.31) (4.32) show that (4.31) and (4.32) the The solutions entire energy of the pump field in the phase- matching regime can be transferred to the second the pump field becomes depleted harmonic. As Fig. 4.4, the second-harmonic field saturates. the growth of Effects related to the group-velocity mismatch be- come significant when the length of the nonlinear medium L exceeds the length Lg = τ1/|u |, −1 1 where τ1 is the pulse width of the pump field. The length Lg characterizes the walk-off between the pump and second-harmonic pulses caused by the group-velocity mismatch. In this nonstationary regime of SHG, the amplitude of the second harmonic in the constant-pump- − u −1 2
field approximation is given by A2 (z, t) = iγ2 z t − z/u2 + ξ A2 10 0 × exp (−i∆kξ) dξ . u −1 2 − u −1 1 (4.33) Group-velocity mismatch may lead to a considerable increase in the pulse width of the second harmonic τ2. For L Lg, the second harmonic pulse width, τ2 ≈ |u |z, scales linearly with the length of the nonlinear medium and is independent of the pump pulse width. − u −1 2 −1 1 4.3.2 Sum- and Difference-Frequency Generation and Parametric Amplification In sum-frequency generation Fig. 4.1, two laser fields with frequencies ω1 and ω2 generate a nonlinear signal at the frequency ω3 = ω1 + ω2 in a quadrati- cally nonlinear medium with a nonlinear susceptibility = χ(2) (ω3; ω1, ω2). In the first order of dis- χ(2) SFG the coupled equations for slowly persion theory, varying envelopes of the laser fields A1 = A1(z, t) and A2 = A2(z, t) and the nonlinear signal A3 = A3(z, t) are written as + 1 u1 + 1 u2 + 1 u3 ∂A1 ∂t ∂A2 ∂t ∂A3 ∂t ∂A1 ∂z ∂A2 ∂z ∂A3 ∂z where = iγ1 A3 A ∗ 2 exp (i∆kz) , = iγ2 A3 A ∗ 1 exp (i∆kz) , = iγ3 A1 A2 exp (−i∆kz) , γ1 = 2πω2 1 k1c2 γ2 = 2πω2 2 k2c2 γ3 = 2πω2 3 k3c2 χ(2) (ω1; ω3,−ω2) , χ(2) (ω2; ω3,−ω1) , χ(2) SFG (4.34) (4.35) (4.36) (4.37) (4.38) (4.39) are the nonlinear coefficients, u1, u2, and u3 and k1, k2, and k3 are the group velocities and the wave vectors of the fields with frequencies ω1, ω2, and ω3, respectively, and ∆k = k1 + k2 − k3 is the wave-vector mismatch for the SFG process. As long as the intensity of the sum-frequency field remains much less than the intensities of the laser fields, the amplitudes of the laser fields can be can be as- sumed to be given functions of t, A1(z, t) = A10(t) and Nonlinear Optics 4.3 Second-Order Nonlinear Processes 163 z A2(z, t) = A20(t), and the solution of (4.36) yields − u −1 1 A3 (z, t) = iγ3 t − z/u3 + ξ −1 3 A10 0 t − z/u3 + ξ × A20 × exp (−i∆kξ) dξ. − u −1 3 −1 2 u u (4.40) −1 1 |L, ∆31 ≈ |u The efficiency of frequency conversion, as can be seen from (4.40) is controlled by the group delays ∆21 ≈ |u − − u −1 −1 |L between the pulses involved in the SFG process. −1 2 3 u 2 In particular, the laser fields cease to interact with each other when the group delay ∆21 starts to exceed the pulse width of the faster laser pulse. |L, and ∆32 ≈ |u − u −1 3 −1 1 In difference-frequency generation (DFG), two input fields with frequencies ω1 and ω2 generate a nonlinear signal at the frequency ω3 = ω1− ω2. This process is of considerable practical significance as it can give rise to intense coherent radiation in the infrared range. In the limiting case of ω1 ≈ ω2, this type of nonlinear-optical interaction corresponds to optical rectification, which has been intensely used over the past two decades for the generation of terahertz radiation. If the field at the frequency ω1 is strong and re- mains undepleted in the process of nonlinear-optical interaction, A1(z, t) = A10(t), the set of coupled equa- tions governing the amplitudes of the remaining two fields in the stationary regime is written as P a r t A 4 . 3 + 1 u2 + 1 u3 ∂A2 ∂t ∂A3 ∂t = iγ2 A1 A = iγ3 A1 A ∗ 3 exp (i∆kz) , 2 exp (−i∆kz) , ∗ ∂A2 ∂z ∂A3 ∂z where, γ2 = 2πω2 2 k2c2 γ3 = 2πω2 3 k3c2 χ(2) (ω2; ω1,−ω3) , χ(2) (ω3; ω1,−ω2) are the nonlinear coefficientsm and ∆k = k1− k2− k3 is the wave-vector mismatch for the DFG process. With no signal at ω3 applied at the input of the non- linear medium, A3(0, t) = 0, the solution to (4.41) and (4.42) in the stationary regime is given by [4.12] sinh (κz) cosh (κz)+ i , A2 (z) = A2 (0) A3 (z) = iA2 (0) sinh (κz) , ∆k 2κ (4.41) (4.42) (4.43) (4.44) (4.45) (4.46)
164 Part A Basic Principles and Materials where κ2 = 4γ2γ∗ 3 |A1|2 − (∆k)2 . (4.47) Away from the phase-matching condition, the amplifica- tion of a weak signal is achieved only when the intensity of the pump field exceeds a threshold, 2 I1 > Ith = n1n2n3c3 (∆k)2 ω2ω3 χ(2) 32π3 DFG , (4.48) where we took χ(2)(ω2; ω1,−ω3) ≈ χ(2)(ω3; ω1,−ω2) = χ(2) Above, this threshold, the growth in the intensity I2 DFG . of a weak input signal is governed by I2 (z) = I2 (0) γ 2 |A10|2 γ∗ κ2 3 sin2 (κz)+ 1 . (4.49) P a r t A 4 . 4 This type of three-wave mixing is often referred to as optical parametric amplification. A weak input field, re- ferred to as the signal field (the field with the amplitude A2 in our case), becomes amplified in this type of pro- cess through a nonlinear interaction with a powerful pump field (the undepleted field with the amplitude A1 in the case considered here). In such a scheme of optical parametric amplification, the third field (the field with the amplitude A3) is called the idler field. We now consider the regime of optical paramet- ric amplification ω1 = ω2 + ω3 where the pump, signal and idler pulses are matched in their wave vectors and group velocities. Introducing the real amplitudes ρ j and phases ϕ j of the pump, signal, and idler fields, , where j = 1, 2, 3, assuming that A j = ρ j exp γ2 = γ3 = γ in (4.35) and (4.36), A1(z, t) = A10(t) and A3(0, t) = 0, we write the solution for the amplitude of the signal field as [4.18] iϕ j A2 (η, z) = A20 (η) cosh [γρ10 (η) z] . (4.50) The idler field then builds up in accordance with A3 (η, z) = A ∗ 20 (η) exp [iϕ10 (η)] sinh [γρ10 (η) z] . (4.51) As can be seen from (4.50), optical parametric ampli- fication preserves the phase of the signal pulse. This property of optical parametric amplification lies at the heart of the principle of optical parametric chirped-pulse amplification [4.19], allowing ultrashort laser pulses to be amplified to relativistic intensities. It also suggests a method of efficient frequency conversion of few-cycle field waveforms without changing the phase offset be- tween their carrier frequency and temporal envelope, making few-cycle laser pulses a powerful tool for the investigation of ultrafast electron dynamics in atomic and molecular systems. In the nonstationary regime of optical paramet- ric amplification, when the pump, signal, and idler fields propagate with different group velocities, useful and important qualitative insights into the phase rela- tions between the pump, signal, and idler pulses can be gained from energy and momentum conservation, ω1 = ω2+ ω3 and k1 = k2+ k3. These equalities dictate the following relations between the frequency deviations δω j in the pump, signal, and idler fields ( j = 1, 2, 3): (4.52) (4.53) (4.54) δω1 = δω2+ δω3 and δω1/u1 = δω2/u2 + δω3/u3 . In view of (4.52) and (4.53), we find δω2 = q2δω1 and (4.55) In the 3 ), q3 = 1− q2. −1 δω3 = q3δω1, where q2 = (u − u − u −1 −1 −1 3 )/(u 1 2 case of a linearly chirped pump, ϕ1(t) = α1t2/2, the phases of the signal and idler pulses are given by ϕm(t) = αmt2/2, where αm = qm α1, m = 2, 3. With qm 1, the chirp of the signal and idler pulses can thus considerably exceed the chirp of the pump field. 4.4 Third-Order Nonlinear Processes Optical nonlinearity of the third order is a univer- sal property, found in any material regardless of its spatial symmetry. This nonlinearity is the lowest- order nonvanishing nonlinearity for a broad class of centrosymmetric materials, where all the even-order nonlinear susceptibilities are identically equal to zero for symmetry reasons. Third-order nonlinear processes include a vast variety of four-wave mixing processes, which are extensively used for frequency conversion of laser radiation and as powerful methods of nonlinear spectroscopy. Frequency-degenerate, Kerr-effect-type phenomena constitute another important class of third-
分享到:
收藏