76-81 GHz Planar Antenna 
Development and Utilization for 
Automotive Radar Applications 
 
Master’s thesis in Wireless and Photonics Engineering 
 
DAPENG WU 
 
Department of Microtechnology and Nanoscience 
CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 
Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 
 
76-81 GHz Planar Antenna Development and Utilization for Automotive Radar 
Applications 
DAPENG WU 
 
© DAPENG WU, 2016 
 
Department of Microtechnology and Nanoscience 
Chalmers University of Technology 
SE-412 96 Göteborg 
Sweden 
Telephone + 46 (0)31-772 1000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chalmers Reproservice 
Göteborg, Sweden 2016 
 
 
ABSTRACT 
Abstract 
 
Automotive radars are becoming more compact and affordable thanks to the rapid 
development of semiconductor technology. Nowadays most vehicles are equipped with radars 
to enhance safety and improve driving experiences. As an essential part of any radar sensor, 
antenna will largely influence the size and cost of the whole system. Therefore, the 
development of automotive radar antenna is a critically important topic of practical interest. 
This thesis presents a 76.5 GHz microstrip comb-line antenna array utilized for a 
commercial automotive radar prototype. First a 13-element 90 degree comb-line array is 
realized in standing wave configuration so no additional reflection-cancelling structures are 
required. In order to achieve a trade-off between beamwidth and sidelobe level, a 20 dB 
Taylor amplitude taper is applied. Based on the conventional 90 degree array, a new array 
with 45 degree polarization is built to minimize the interference from cars moving in the 
opposite direction. All simulations are performed in Momentum Simulator of Advanced 
Design System. 
The dimensions of 90 and 45 degree comb-line arrays are 20.7×2.5 mm2 and 20.5×2.0 
mm2, respectively. Both of them are implemented on Rogers RO3003 substrate. A 
probe-based setup is employed for the measurement of S-parameter and radiation patterns. 
From 76 to 78 GHz, both arrays exhibit consistent performance. At 76.5 GHz, the 45 degree 
array yields a maximum gain of 11.35 dBi at           and a sidelobe level of -16.3 dB; the 
cross-polarization level is fluctuating around -10 dB. Overall, the measurement results show 
good agreement with simulations. 
 
Keywords: antenna, automotive radar, microstrip, comb-line, millimeter wave 
 
 
I 
ACKNOWLEDGMENT 
Acknowledgment 
 
It would not have been possible to complete this thesis without the generous contributions of 
many great people. 
First and  foremost,  I  would  like  to  express  my  sincerest  gratitude  to  my  supervisor  Dr. 
Ralf Reuter for his immense  expertise, contagious  enthusiasm and tremendous patience. The 
valuable experiences I gained under his guidance will pave the way for my future career. I am 
also  deeply  grateful  to  my  examiner  Professor  Jian  Yang  for  providing  insightful  advices  to 
improve my work and refine my thesis. 
Furthermore,  I  am  indebted  to  Dr.  Ziqiang  Tong  for  the  helpful  discussion  and  warm 
hospitality  during  my  stay  in  Germany.  Special  thanks  go  out  to  Dr.  Heiko  Gulan  and  Dr. 
Christian Rusch for devoting enormous efforts to the antenna measurement. 
Finally, I want to thank  my family for the unconditional love and  wholehearted support 
throughout my study. 
 
 
II 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
Table of Contents 
 
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... I 
 
Acknowledgment ......................................................................................................................... II 
 
List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. IV 
 
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 
1.1 Overview of Automotive Radar System .......................................................................... 1 
1.2 Antennas for Automotive Radars ..................................................................................... 3 
1.3 Aim of the Thesis Project .................................................................................................. 4 
 
2 Analysis of Microstrip Comb-Line Antenna Array ............................................................... 7 
2.1 Characteristics of Microstrip Open-Circuit Stub as a Radiating Element ..................... 7 
2.1.1 Radiation Pattern of a Microstrip Open-Circuit Stub .......................................... 7 
2.1.2 Impact of Substrate Surface Waves ....................................................................... 9 
2.1.3 Improved Analysis of Microstrip Open-Circuit Stub ......................................... 11 
2.1.4 End Admittance of Microstrip Open-Circuit Stub .............................................13 
2.2 Comb-Line Antenna Array with Microstrip Open-Circuit Stubs .................................14 
2.2.1 Microstrip Open-Circuit Stub as an Array Element ...........................................15 
2.2.2 Comparison of Traveling Wave Array and Standing Wave Array.....................17 
 
3 Designs of 90 and 45 Degree Standing Wave Microstrip Comb-Line Antenna Arrays.19 
3.1 90 Degree Uniform Comb-Line Antenna Array ............................................................19 
3.2 90 Degree Amplitude Tapered Comb-Line Antenna Array ..........................................22 
3.3 45 Degree Amplitude Tapered Comb-Line Antenna Array ..........................................26 
 
4  Measurements  of  90  and  45  Degree  Standing  Wave  Microstrip  Comb-Line  Antenna 
Arrays ............................................................................................................................................29 
4.1 Probe-Based Antenna Measurement Setup ....................................................................29 
4.2 Measurement Results of 90 and 45 Degree Comb-Line Antenna Arrays ....................31 
4.2.1 90 Degree Amplitude Tapered Comb-Line Aray ................................................31 
4.2.2 45 Degree Amplitude Tapered Comb-Line Aray ................................................34 
 
5 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................37 
 
References .....................................................................................................................................39 
 
 
 
 
III 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 
List of Abbreviations 
 
ACC 
ADS 
AiP 
AoC 
AUT 
CAD 
Adaptive Cruise Control 
Advanced Design System 
Antenna in Package 
Antenna on Chip 
Antenna Under Test 
Computer-Aided Design 
CMOS 
Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor 
CST 
CTA 
EMI 
eWLB 
FMCW 
GaAs 
GSG 
HFSS 
HPBW 
LRR 
MRR 
RCP 
SiGe 
SOL 
SRR 
TEM 
 
Computer Simulation Technology 
Cross Traffic Alert 
Electromagnetic Interference 
Embedded Wafer Level Ball Grid Array 
Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave 
Gallium Arsenide 
Ground-Signal-Ground 
High Frequency Structural Simulator 
Half-Power Beamwidth 
Lang Range Radar 
Medium Range Radar 
Redistributed Chip Package 
Silicon-Germanium 
Short-Open-Load 
Short Range Radar 
Transverse Electromagnetic 
 
IV 
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 
1 Introduction 
 
In 1904, the German inventor Christian Hülsmeyer built a device for the detection of ships in 
fog, which is commonly referred to as the first radar system. During World War Ⅱ, radar was 
put into practice and under a rapid development. Nowadays, radar is also widely used in civil 
areas and one of the most important applications is the automotive radar system. 
 
1.1 Overview of Automotive Radar System 
 
As early as 1964 the use of radar system on vehicles for the prevention of collisions has been 
discussed  [1].  In  the  1970s  some  automotive  radar  prototypes  were  built  and  road  tested 
[2]-[4]. However, at that time the high cost and large dimensions of key components were the 
limiting factors for commercial application. It was not until the 1990s that major automobile 
manufacturers and suppliers started the  research  on automotive radar again. Since 1992 a 24 
GHz  Doppler  radar  system  developed  by  Eaton  VORAD  Technologies  has  been  installed  in 
1700  Greyhound  buses  and  it  helped  to  reduce  the  accident  rate  by  25%  [5].  In  the  late  90s 
Mercedes-Benz  firstly  introduced  the  77GHz-radar-based  DISTRONIC system  [6]  and  other 
manufacturers  soon  followed  with  their  own  products.  Today  most  high  and  middle  class 
vehicles  are  equipped  with  radar  sensors and  it  is  safe  to  predict  that  it  will  be  more  widely 
available and affordable in the near future. 
 
 
Figure 1.1 Block diagram of a frequency 
Figure  1.2  Frequency-time  relationships  of  transmitted 
-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) 
and received signals in FMCW radar 
automotive radar 
 
 
Figure  1.1  is  the  general  block  diagram  of  a  frequency-modulated  continuous-wave 
(FMCW)  automotive  radar,  it  is  capable  of  measuring  both  the  distance  and  velocity  of  a 
moving  object.  Assuming  that  a  linear  sawtooth  frequency  modulation  is  applied  to  the 
transmitted signal, as is shown in Figure 1.2, the time delay      can be calculated by 
 
 
    
  
 
 
(1.1) 
 
where      is  the  frequency  difference  between  the  transmitted  and  received  signals  which 
 
1 
SignalSourcePowerDividerSignalProcessingMixerTXAntennaRXAntennaft∆t∆f                                Transmitted Signal                          Received Signal
76-81 GHZ PLANAR ANTENNA DEVELOPMENT AND UTILIZATION FOR RADAR APPLICATIONS 
could be measured from the mixer output and     is the frequency sweep rate. 
The distance between the observer and target is then given by 
 
 
   
      
 
 
(1.2) 
 
Here     is  the  speed  of  light  in  air  and  a  factor  of         is  introduced  to  get  the  one-way 
distance. 
Two  different  frequency  bands  are  available  for  automotive  radar applications:  24  GHz 
and 77- GHz. The 77 GHz solution offers advantages such as smaller dimension and broader 
bandwidth,  but also  faces  more  challenges  in  design  and  implementation. The  77  GHz  band 
could  be  divided  into  two  subbands:  76-77  GHz and  77-81  GHz  (also  called  79  GHz  band). 
The former has been approved by most countries, while the latter is only available in Europe 
so far but has been under discussion in other countries. 
The functions of automotive radar sensors vary with their maximum ranges. Long range 
radar  (LRR)  has  a  narrow  beam  and  it  is  usually  mounted  in  the  front  grill  to  measure  the 
distance  of  objects ahead  (up  to 250  m);  short range  radar  (SRR)  offers a  broader  beam  and 
can be used to monitor the vicinity of a vehicle (within 30 m); between LRR and SRR, there 
is medium range radar (MRR) which can be installed on the front, the rear, or the side area for 
different applications. Detailed comparisons of the three sensor types are given in Table 1.1. 
 
 
 
Table 1.1 Automotive radar classifications 
 
LRR 
MRR 
SRR 
Maximum Range (m) 
Applications 
150-250 
60-150 
30 
Adaptive cruise control (ACC) 
Cross traffic alert (CTA), ACC 
Blind spot detection, parking aid 
The  first  generation  of  commercial  automotive  radar  in  77  GHz  was  implemented  in 
gallium  arsenide  (GaAs)  technology  [7].  Despite  their  excellent  performance,  the  market 
share  of  GaAs-based  products  is  limited  by  the  high  fabrication  cost.  Nowadays,  most 
automotive radar sensors are based on silicon-germanium (SiGe) technology since it is a more 
cost-effective  solution.  As  one  of  the  main  automotive  semiconductor  suppliers,  Freescale 
presented  its  own  transceiver  chipset  using  SiGe  BiCMOS  technology  in  2012  [8].  It 
consisted  of  a  four-channel  receiver  and  a  single-channel  transmitter,  which  covered  the 
whole  frequency  range  of  76-81  GHz  and  could  be  used  for  both  LRR  and  SRR.  Besides 
on-wafer measurement, the chips were also tested in redistributed chip package (RCP) and the 
results showed great potential for commercial applications. 
In 2009, Fujitsu Laboratories reported the first 77 GHz automotive radar transceiver chip 
in 90 nm CMOS technology [9]; one year later, researchers from National Taiwan University 
published a fully integrated 77 GHz FMCW radar system in 65  nm CMOS technology [10]. 
The  advantages  of  CMOS  technology  are  the  lower  cost  and  power  consumption,  however, 
the  current  performances  of  CMOS  radars  are  not  yet  comparable  with  their  SiGe 
counterparts.  Therefore,  there  is  still  a  long  way  to  go  for  CMOS  automotive  radars  to 
 
2