logo资料库

ITU-R M.1225 标准.pdf

第1页 / 共60页
第2页 / 共60页
第3页 / 共60页
第4页 / 共60页
第5页 / 共60页
第6页 / 共60页
第7页 / 共60页
第8页 / 共60页
资料共60页,剩余部分请下载后查看
RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1225 – GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION OF RADIO TRANSMISSION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMT-2000
1 Introduction
2 Scope
3 Structure of the Recommendation
4 Related Documents
5 Radio transmission technology considerations
5.1 Radio transmission technologies functional blocks
5.2 Other functional blocks
6 Technical characteristics chosen for evaluation
6.1 Criteria for evaluation of radio transmission technologies
7 Selected test environments for evaluation
8 Guidelines for evaluating the radio transmission technologies by independent evaluation groups
9 Evaluation methodology
9.1 Objective criteria
9.2 Subjective criteria
9.3 Evaluation spreadsheet
9.4 Summary evaluations
ANNEX 1 – Radio transmission technologies description template
ANNEX 2 – Test environments and deployment models
PART 1 – Terrestrial component
1 Test environments
1.1 Test environment descriptions
1.2 Propagation models
1.3 Link budget template and deployment models
PART 2 – Satellite component
2.1 Propagation models
2.2 Satellite test scenarios: link budget and deployment model
APPENDIX 1 TO ANNEX 2 – Propagation models
1 Propagation models
1.1 Path loss models
1.2 Channel impulse response model
APPENDIX 2 TO ANNEX 2 – Computation of Doppler shift for satellites
ANNEX 3 – Detailed evaluation procedures
Rec. ITU-R M.1225 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1225 GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION OF RADIO TRANSMISSION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMT-2000 (Question ITU-R 39/8) (1997) Page 2 2 3 3 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 Rec. ITU-R M.1225 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... Scope.............................................................................................................................................................. Structure of the Recommendation.................................................................................................................. Related documents ......................................................................................................................................... Radio transmission technology considerations .............................................................................................. Radio transmission technologies functional blocks .......................................................................... 5.1 Multiple access technology............................................................................................... 5.1.1 5.1.2 Modulation technology ..................................................................................................... Channel coding and interleaving....................................................................................... 5.1.3 Duplexing technology....................................................................................................... 5.1.4 Physical channel structure and multiplexing..................................................................... 5.1.5 5.1.6 Frame structure ................................................................................................................. 5.1.7 RF channel parameters...................................................................................................... Other functional blocks..................................................................................................................... 5.2.1 Source coder ..................................................................................................................... Interworking...................................................................................................................... 5.2.2 5.2 Technical characteristics chosen for evaluation ............................................................................................. 6.1 Criteria for evaluation of radio transmission technologies ............................................................... Spectrum efficiency .......................................................................................................... 6.1.1 Technology complexity – Effect on cost of installation and operation............................. 6.1.2 6.1.3 Quality .............................................................................................................................. Flexibility of radio technologies ....................................................................................... 6.1.4 Implication on network interface ...................................................................................... 6.1.5 6.1.6 Handportable performance optimization capability.......................................................... Coverage/power efficiency ............................................................................................... 6.1.7 Selected test environments for evaluation...................................................................................................... Guidelines for evaluating the radio transmission technologies by independent evaluation groups ............... Evaluation methodology ................................................................................................................................ Objective criteria .............................................................................................................................. 9.1 9.2 Subjective criteria ............................................................................................................................. Evaluation spreadsheet ..................................................................................................................... 9.3 Summary evaluations........................................................................................................................ 9.4 9.4.1 Methodology for summary criteria evaluations ................................................................ 11 12 12 12 13 13
2 Rec. ITU-R M.1225 Annex 1 – Radio transmission technologies description template .......................................................................... Annex 2 – Test environments and deployment models........................................................................................... Appendix 1 to Annex 2 – Propagation models........................................................................................................ Appendix 2 to Annex 2 – Computation of Doppler shift for satellites.................................................................... Annex 3 – Detailed evaluation procedures.............................................................................................................. Page 13 22 44 48 50 1 Introduction International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) are third generation mobile systems which are scheduled to start service around the year 2000 subject to market considerations. They will provide access, by means of one or more radio links, to a wide range of telecommunication services supported by the fixed telecommunication networks (e.g. PSTN/ISDN), and to other services which are specific to mobile users. A range of mobile terminal types is encompassed, linking to terrestrial and/or satellite based networks, and the terminals may be designed for mobile or fixed use. Key features of IMT-2000 are: – – – – high degree of commonality of design worldwide, compatibility of services within IMT-2000 and with the fixed networks, high quality, use of a small pocket terminal with worldwide roaming capability. IMT-2000 will operate worldwide in bands identified by Radio Regulations provision No. S5.388 (1 885-2 025 and 2 110-2 200 MHz, with the satellite component limited to 1 980-2 010 and 2 170-2 200 MHz). IMT-2000 are defined by a set of interdependent ITU Recommendations, of which this Recommendation is a member. It is a design objective of IMT-2000 that the number of radio interfaces should be minimal and, if more than one interface is required, that there should be a high degree of commonality between them. These radio interfaces will serve the radio operating environments as nominated in Recommendation ITU-R M.1034. A number of sets of radio transmission technologies (SRTTs) may meet the requirements for the radio interfaces. This Recommendation contains the procedure and criteria that will be used to evaluate candidate radio transmission technologies (RTTs). The subject matter of IMT-2000 is complex and its representation in the form of Recommendations is evolving. To maintain the pace of progress on the subject it is necessary to produce a sequence of Recommendations on a variety of aspects. The recommendations strive to avoid apparent conflicts between themselves. Nevertheless, future Recommendations, or revisions, will be used to resolve any discrepancies. 2 Scope This Recommendation provides guidelines for both the procedure and the criteria to be used in evaluating RTTs for a number of test environments. These test environments, defined herein, are chosen to simulate closely the more stringent radio operating environments. The evaluation procedure is designed in such a way that the impact of the candidate RTTs on the overall performance and economics of IMT-2000 may be fairly and equally assessed on a technical basis. It ensures that the overall IMT-2000 objectives are met. The Recommendation provides, for proponents and developers of RTTs, the common bases for the submission and evaluation of RTTs and system aspects impacting the radio performance.
Rec. ITU-R M.1225 3 This Recommendation allows a degree of freedom so as to encompass new technologies. The actual selection of the RTTs for IMT-2000 is outside the scope of this Recommendation. It deals only with the methodology for the technical evaluations that should be performed. The results of the evaluation are to be documented in an evaluation report and submitted to the ITU-R. 3 Structure of the Recommendation Section 5 outlines the RTT considerations and identifies the transmission dependent part of the radio interface considered in the evaluation procedure. Section 6 defines the criteria for evaluating the RTTs and § 7 references the tests environments under which the candidate RTTs are evaluated. Section 8 outlines the overall procedure for evaluating the RTTs. Section 9 gives details on evaluation methodology. The following Annexes form part of this Recommendation: Annex 1: Radio transmission technologies description template Annex 2: Test environments and deployment models Annex 3: Detailed evaluation procedures 4 Related Documents Recommendation ITU-R M.687 International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) Recommendation ITU-R M.816 Recommendation ITU-R M.818 Recommendation ITU-R M.819 Recommendation ITU-R M.1034 Recommendation ITU-R M.1035 Recommendation ITU-R M.1036 Recommendation ITU-R M.1079 Recommendation ITU-R M.1224. ITU-T Recommendation G.174 ITU-T Recommendation F.115 Recommendation ITU-R M.1167 ITU-T Recommendation E.770 ITU-T Recommendation E.771 Framework for services supported on International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) Satellite Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) operation within International Mobile International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) for developing countries Requirements for the radio interface(s) for International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) for the Framework radio subsystem functionality for International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) interfaces and radio Spectrum considerations for Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) 1 885-2 025 MHz and 2 110-2 200 MHz implementation of International the bands in Speech and voiceband data performance International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) requirements for Vocabulary of terms for International Mobile Telecommunications- 2000 (IMT-2000) Transmission performance objectives for terrestrial digital wireless systems using portable terminals to access the PSTN Service objectives and principles for Future Public Land Mobile Telecommunication Systems (FPLMTS) Framework for the satellite component of International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) Land mobile and fixed network interconnection traffic grade of service concept Network grade of service parameters and target values for circuit- switched public land mobile services
4 5 Radio transmission technology considerations Rec. ITU-R M.1225 Within a telecommunication system (see Fig. 1), a RTT reflects the combination of technical choices and concepts that allow for the provision of a radio subsystem. The evaluation process for candidate IMT-2000 RTTs will involve maximizing the transmission independent aspects and minimizing the differences between the remaining transmission dependent parts in the various IMT-2000 operating environments from an implementation perspective. Radio transmission technologies as part of a total telecommunication system FIGURE 1 Telecommunication system Total quality management Customer care Environment, market and regulations Telecommunications Management Network Market impact, measurable performance, customers perception, environment impact Network infrastructure Radio transmission technology Radio transmission technology Access technology Modulation technology Channel coding and interleaving RF-channel parameters Duplexing technology Frame structure Physical channel structure and multiplexing FIGURE 1225-01 = 16 CM 1225-01
Figure 2 presents an example of a layered structure of radio interface. Rec. ITU-R M.1225 5 FIGURE 2 Example of a layered structure of radio interface Network layer containing: call control, mobility management, radio resource management Layer 3 Link access control layer Layer 2 Medium access control layer Layer 1 Physical layer Transmission independent Transmission dependent 1225-02 FIGURE 1225-02 = 12 CM As shown in Fig. 3, the transmission dependent part of the radio interface may be considered as a set of functional blocks. It should be noted that all these functional blocks are not necessarily transmission dependent in their entirety. The functional blocks identified here are the following: – multiple access technology, – modulation technology, – – – – – channel coding and interleaving, RF-channel parameters such as bandwidth, allocation and channel spacing, duplexing technology, frame structure, physical channel structure and multiplexing. In the process of making design choices, the dependencies between the above functional blocks have to be considered. Some of the interdependencies are shown in Fig. 3 and are further described in § 5.1.
6 Rec. ITU-R M.1225 FIGURE 3 Functional blocks and their interdependencies Radio transmission technologies Physical channel definition and multiplexing Frame structure Duplexing technology RF-channel parameters Multiple access technology Modulation technology Synchronization requirements Spectrum efficiency requirements Source coder Interworking Channel coding 1225-03 FIGURE 1225-03 = 10 CM 5.1 Radio transmission technologies functional blocks 5.1.1 Multiple access technology The choice of the multiple access technology has major impact on the design of the radio interface. 5.1.2 Modulation technology The choice of the modulation technology depends mainly on radio environment and the spectrum efficiency requirements. 5.1.3 Channel coding and interleaving The choice of channel coding depends on the propagation environment and spectrum efficiency and quality requirements of the various services. Applications of large cells, especially in case of satellite component, usually require more powerful channel coding, while microcellular systems, used in a pedestrian environment, may allow less complex channel coding. For the choice of the channel coding with or without interleaving, it may be desirable to have multiple choices; each optimized to the appropriate service environment. 5.1.4 Duplexing technology The choice of the duplexing technology mainly affects the choices of the RF-channel bandwidth and the frame length. Duplexing technology may be independent of the access technology since for example either frequency division duplex (FDD) or time division duplex (TDD) may be used with either TDMA or CDMA systems. 5.1.5 Physical channel structure and multiplexing The physical channel is a specified portion of one or more radio frequency channels as defined in frequency, time and code domain.
Rec. ITU-R M.1225 7 5.1.6 Frame structure The frame structure depends mainly on the multiple access technology (e.g. FDMA, TDMA, CDMA) and the duplexing technology (e.g. FDD, TDD). Commonality should be maximised by maintaining the same frame structure whenever possible. That is, data fields identifying physical and logical channels, as well as the frame length should be maintained when possible. 5.1.7 RF channel parameters RF channel parameters include parameters such as bandwidth, allocation and channel spacing. 5.2 Other functional blocks 5.2.1 Source coder The choice of the source coder may generally be made independently of the access method. 5.2.2 Interworking The interworking function (IWF) converts standard data services to the rates used internally by the radio transmission subsystem. The IWF feeds into the channel coder on the transmit side and is fed from the channel decoder on the receiver side. 6 Technical characteristics chosen for evaluation As a radio interface is only one part of a system, the choice of a specific RTT (see Fig. 1), for the provision of a radio interface for IMT-2000, requires consideration of the broad technical characteristics so as to cover the most important aspects that may impact the economics and performance of the system. For practical reasons, a limited set of these technical characteristics has been chosen. It by no means implies that other (technical and non-technical) criteria are not relevant or significant. It is however believed that those essential system aspects which are impacted by the RTTs are fairly covered with the selected technical characteristics. Given the difficulties of predicting the future, in particular when dealing with technology, sufficient provision is also made for a fair technical evaluation for all possible technologies, particularly new technologies. This is accomplished by making sure that it is not only the technology itself which is evaluated but also its impact on the system performance and economics. 6.1 Criteria for evaluation of radio transmission technologies Each of the technical characteristics defined hereafter will be used as evaluation criterion and is further defined in the specific technical attributes in Annex 3. The RTTs description template is given in Annex 1. Some of the criteria such as coverage or spectrum efficiency are measurable and may be numerically evaluated. Specific test scenarios are given in Annex 2 so as to enable the proponents and evaluators to calculate and verify the required figures on a common and fair basis. Other criteria such as flexibility are of a more subjective nature and need to be assessed qualitatively. Advantages and drawbacks of the proposed technologies are to be given and commented on by the proponents and evaluators considering the technical parameters that are judged relevant to the criterion. A list of technical parameters that will be considered for each evaluation criterion, is given in Annex 3. 6.1.1 Spectrum efficiency Optimum use of the radio spectrum is of great importance to IMT-2000 radio interfaces. In general the more telecommunications traffic that can be handled at a given quality, for a given frequency band, the more efficiently the spectrum is used. Evaluation of voice traffic capacity and information capacity should take into account frequency reuse and signalling overhead, among other parameters, as noted in Annex 2.
8 Rec. ITU-R M.1225 6.1.2 Technology complexity – Effect on cost of installation and operation This criterion expresses the impact of a given RTT on complexity (and hence on cost) of implementation (equipment, infrastructure, installation, etc.) i.e., the less complex the better. In order to achieve the minimum cost and best reliability of equipment, the technologies selected should have a level of complexity consistent with the state of technology, the desired service objectives and the radio environment. Some technologies have several possible methods of implementation which allow a compromise between complexity/cost and performance. The installed and ongoing cost of IMT-2000 is influenced by both the transmission technology and the level of quality and reliability. At a given quality level, it is impacted by the complexity of the radio hardware, the other necessary network infrastructures, and the ongoing operational aspects of IMT-2000. 6.1.3 Quality Most of the quality parameters which are dealt with in other Recommendations are minimum requirements which must be met and are not to be treated in the evaluation process. RTTs will be evaluated on the impact of transmission processing delay on the end-to-end delay, expected average bit error ratio (BER) under the stated test conditions, on their maximum supportable bit rate under specified conditions and their overall ability to minimise circuit disruption during handover. In addition, they will be evaluated on their ability to sustain quality under certain extreme conditions such as system overload, hardware failures, interference, etc. 6.1.4 Flexibility of radio technologies This criterion is of utmost importance for IMT-2000 operators. IMT-2000 systems will have to be flexible in terms of deployment, service provision, resource planning and spectrum sharing. Among the items that need to be considered are: – – – – – ability to balance capacity versus RF signal quality as long as minimum performance requirements are met; adaptability of system(s) to different and/or time-varying propagation and traffic environments; ease of radio resource management; ability to accommodate fixed wireless access (FWA) architecture; ease of service provision including variable bit rate capability, packet data mode transmission and simultaneous transmission of voice and non-voice services; and for terrestrial considerations: – – ability to accommodate mixed-cell (pico, micro, macro, and mega) architecture; suitability for multiple operators in the same/overlapping service areas. RTTs will be compared based on their ability to: – – – efficiently share a common spectrum allocation; share network infrastructures (for example in areas of low subscriber density); provide for handover between systems run by different operators. 6.1.5 Implication on network interface It is desirable to minimise the impact of the radio subsystems on fixed network interfaces. The choice of RTTs may affect both the actual network interfaces required in IMT-2000 for multi-environment operation and the information passed over them. The need for synchronization between base stations (BSs) and between systems sharing common location and spectrum may be different. The requirements placed on the networks by the handover procedure may be different. Cross-environment operation, e.g. PSTN to wireless PBX call transfer, may require additional PSTN functionality. In particular, the number of signalling messages, the actual switching requirements, and the transmission capacity from BSs to switches may be different. RTTs should be evaluated based on the implications they impose on fixed network interfaces.
分享到:
收藏