logo资料库

功能安全实施案例(Volvo).pdf

第1页 / 共80页
第2页 / 共80页
第3页 / 共80页
第4页 / 共80页
第5页 / 共80页
第6页 / 共80页
第7页 / 共80页
第8页 / 共80页
资料共80页,剩余部分请下载后查看
Introduction
Context
Aim
Problem description
Method
Scope
Organization of the thesis
The ISO 26262 standard
Work flow
Item definition
Hazard analysis and risk assessment
Functional safety concept
Technical safety concept and requirements
Hardware development
Hardware evaluation
Hardware architecture metrics
Random hardware failure metric
Volvo Engine Brake
Exhaust Brake
Volvo Compression Brake
A concept for compliance with ISO 26262
Item definition
Hazard analysis
Functional safety concept
Technical safety concept
Subsystem interface
Microcontroller
Subsystem inputs
Subsystem outputs
Power supply and reference voltages
Concept statement
Prototype design and verification
Microcontroller
Prototype hardware
Prototype software
Prototype verification
High-side MOSFET safety mechanisms
Discussion
The next revision of the standard
The prototype
Diagnostic coverage
Ethical aspects
Conclusions
Acronyms
Bibliography
Appendix FMEDA
Appendix Fault injection circuit
Safety mechanisms for random ECU hardware failures in compliance with ISO 26262 Master of Science Thesis in Embedded Electronic System Design DAVID JOHANSSON PHILIP KARLSSON Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden June 2015
The Author grants to Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg the non-exclusive right to publish the Work electronically and in a non-commercial pur- pose make it accessible on the Internet. The Author warrants that he/she is the author to the Work, and warrants that the Work does not contain text, pictures or other mate- rial that violates copyright law. The Author shall, when transferring the rights of the Work to a third party (for example a publisher or a company), acknowledge the third party about this agreement. If the Author has signed a copyright agreement with a third party regarding the Work, the Author warrants hereby that he/she has obtained any necessary permission from this third party to let Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg store the Work electronically and make it accessible on the Internet. Safety mechanisms for random ECU hardware failures in compliance with ISO 26262 DAVID JOHANSSON, PHILIP KARLSSON, c DAVID JOHANSSON, June 2015. c PHILIP KARLSSON, June 2015. Examiner: PER LARSSON-EDEFORS Chalmers University of Technology University of Gothenburg Department of Computer Science and Engineering SE-412 96 G¨oteborg Sweden Telephone + 46 (0)31-772 1000 Department of Computer Science and Engineering G¨oteborg, Sweden June 2015
Abstract The increasing complexity of today’s automotive electronic systems makes it chal- lenging for manufacturers to ensure a high safety level in their vehicles. As a response, the ISO 26262 functional safety standard will be introduced for heavy-duty vehicles in 2018. Therefore, the hardware and software solutions developed by Volvo Group Trucks Technology will need to be adapted to comply with this standard. In addition to an analysis of ISO 26262, this thesis provides a case study of how the Volvo Engine Brake (VEB) can be adapted to comply with the standard. The analysis is focused on the electronic hardware of the engine control unit, and examines various safety mechanisms to improve the current system. The hazard of unwanted activation of the engine brake function is estimated to have ASIL C - the second most critical safety level. To comply with the requirements of ASIL C, the peripheral circuits of the engine brake should include both low and high-side MOSFET switches. Although a hardware-based diagnosis solution for actuator failures is presented, the study shows that a software-based safety mechanism is sufficient, which reduces the amount of extra hardware required. Additionally, if the inputs to the engine brake application are consid- ered to be safety critical in a full evaluation, redundant sensors are required to meet the targets for ASIL C. A number of the solutions proposed in the concept for compliance with the standard are implemented and verified through a prototype.
i
Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Agne Holmqvist and Julianus Larson who have been our supervisors at Volvo Group Trucks Technology. They have assisted us throughout the thesis work and provided us with valuable feedback. Also, we would like to thank Erik Svang˚ard and his group for giving us the opportunity to perform our thesis work at their department. Finally, we would also like to thank Lena Peterson, our supervisor at Chalmers, who has helped us with questions of academic nature. David Johansson, Philip Karlsson, G¨oteborg, 3 June 2015. ii
iii
Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Aim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3 Problem description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.4 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.6 Organization of the thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 2 2 4 4 5 2 The ISO 26262 standard 6 6 2.1 Work flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.2 Item definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3 Hazard analysis and risk assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4 Functional safety concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.5 Technical safety concept and requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.6 Hardware development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.6.1 Hardware evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.6.2 Hardware architecture metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.6.3 Random hardware failure metric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3 Volvo Engine Brake 21 3.1 Exhaust Brake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.2 Volvo Compression Brake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4 A concept for compliance with ISO 26262 25 4.1 Item definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 4.2 Hazard analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 4.3 Functional safety concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4.4 Technical safety concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 4.4.1 Subsystem interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 4.4.2 Microcontroller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 iv
分享到:
收藏