Int. J. Communications, Network and System Sciences, 2017, 10, 206-217
http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijcns
ISSN Online: 1913-3723
ISSN Print: 1913-3715
Optimization of Adaptive MTI Filter
Wenxu Zhang, Shudi Ma, Qiuying Du
College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China
How to cite this paper: Zhang, W.X., Ma,
S.D. and Du, Q.Y. (2017) Optimization of
Adaptive MTI Filter. Int. J. Communica-
tions, Network and System Sciences, 10,
206-217.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcns.2017.108B022
Received: May 31, 2017
Accepted: August 11, 2017
Published: August 14, 2017
Abstract
Moving target indication (MTI) is an effective means for radar to find moving
targets in clutter environment. This paper introduces the basic principles of
MTI, how to avoid the blind speed problem and the optimization of MTI fil-
ter. Implementing the multi-notch adaptive moving target indication (AMTI)
filter that designed by using the stagger code in varied cases, which is based on
a feature vector method optimization.
Keywords
Adaptive Moving Target Indication (AMTI), Stagger Code, Feature Vector
Method, Multi-Notch
1. Introduction
MTI band-stop filter as a “single channel”, followed by detection is relatively
simple. When the target speed is large and the repetition frequency is low, make
sure that there is no distance blur, through the “variable week” variable repeat
cycle or repeat and “time varying” [1]. Can overcome the blind speed problem,
the drawback is no improvement in noise. In general, the mess is not very strong,
the radar can handle a limited number of pulses, suitable for the use of repetitive
and time-varying weighted system. The adaptive has a variety of ways to achieve,
in which the performance is better “first order” and “second order”. The first-
order basic method is to use the interval-based velocity measurement and the
zero-point distribution method to determine the weighting parameters of the
clutter cancellation filter to obtain the filter whose notch is aligned with the cen-
ter of the clutter spectrum [2]. Its advantages are simpler, the disadvantage is
that it cannot be adaptive with the clutter spectrum, so sometimes the perfor-
mance is worse. The second-order basic method is to estimate the clutter cova-
riance matrix, and then use matrix inversion or feature decomposition feature
vector method to determine the filter weight coefficient.
This paper first analyzes the moving target indication (MTI), on this basis, the
DOI: 10.4236/ijcns.2017.108B022 August 14, 2017
W. X. Zhang et al.
MTI is optimized, and the appropriate filter coefficients are designed by the fea-
ture vector method, which can effectively suppress the clutter. And the use of
stagger code design MTI filter to eliminate the impact of blind speed. For mo-
tion clutter, the spectral center is not at zero frequency, and is time-varying. In
order to suppress such clutter, this paper adopts adaptive motion clutter sup-
pression technique AMTI, and designs multi-notch AMTI filter [3].
2. Research on Adaptive Clutter Suppression Algorithm
The earliest MTI filter is a delay line canceller, is currently one of the most
commonly used MTI filter. According to the different number of cancellation,
but also divided into single delay line canceller, double delay line canceller and
multi-delay line canceller [4].
Single delay line canceller as shown in Figure 1, the impulse response of the
is equal to the
( )
x t
( )
y t
and the input
( )h t
( )h t
, and output
single delay line canceller is expressed as
convolution between the impulse response
The impulse response of the counter is:
(
−
δ δ
( )
h t
( )
t
=
[5].
)r
t T
−
(1)
The power gain of the single delay line canceller is:
H
(
)
ω
2
2
4 sin
=
rT
ω
2
(2)
Double delay line canceller as shown in Figure 2. The response of the double
delay line canceller is
( )
h t
=
δ
( )
t
−
(
2
δ
t T
−
r
)
+
(
δ
t
−
T
2
r
)
(3)
x(t)
h(t)
+
DelayTr
Σ
-
y(t)
x(t)
Figure 1. Single delay line canceller.
h(t)
+
Σ
-
+
Σ
-
DelayTr
DelayTr
Figure 2. Double delay line canceller.
y(t)
207
W. X. Zhang et al.
The double delay line canceller impulse response is:
H
(
)
ω
2
=
H
1
(
)
ω
2
H
1
(
)
ω
2
=
16 sin
rT
ω
2
4
(4)
The adaptive moving target indication (AMTI) filter is usually composed of a
FIR filter with a horizontal structure. The output of the MTI filter is:
( )
( )
Y n W X n
=
T
=
1
−
N
∑
i
=
0
w x n i
−
i
(
)
(5)
where W is the weight vector and
quency response of this filter is:
)
(
H f
=
N
1
−
∑
i
=
0
X n is the input signal vector. The fre-
( )
w
i
exp
(
−
j
fTπ
2
i
)
(6)
In the radar system, in order to avoid the occurrence of blind effects, usually
the use of “variable T” approach, that is, by regularly changing the radar launch
pulse period so that the frequency of blindness is greater than the target possible
Doppler frequency. Adaptive clutter suppression is compatible with parametric
techniques, meaning that the clutter suppression filter must be time-varying. For
the determined N value, the frequency characteristic of the MTI filter is de-
termined only by the weight vector, so the calculation of the weight vector is the
core of the MTI process, according to different design methods, the optimal
weight vector is generally different. In engineering practice, the improvement
factor is often used to measure the performance of MTI system. The improve-
. Obviously, the
ment factor of the MTI filter is defined as
greater the I , the better the effect of the system on clutter suppression. It has
been proved that the optimal weight vector of the MTI filter should be the ei-
genvector corresponding to the minimum eigenvalue of the covariance matrix of
the input clutter, in order to maximize the average improvement factor of the
MTI. At this point the improvement factor is max
λ=
min
S C
o
0
S C
i
i
) (
/
1/
=
(
)
I
I
/
/
[6].
2.1. Optimal Design of Filter
The so-called optimization design requires a set of optimal filter coefficients, to
maximize the improvement factor, a lot of design methods. In the case of the va-
riable T, the better methods are feature vector method, matching algorithm, ze-
ro-point allocation method and linear prediction method [7]. The feature vector
method is the solution that minimizes the clutter output power when the target
gain is constant. The zero-point assignment method is to set the frequency re-
sponse zero at the notch when designing the band-stop filter. The matching al-
gorithm and the linear prediction method are the solutions that minimize the
clutter output power when one of the elements of the weight vector is constant.
So the feature vector method has better performance [8].
The feature vector method is a clutter suppression method based on the
maximum improvement factor.
It is usually assumed that the clutter has a Gaussian power spectrum, the
fσ , and the spectral density function
0f , the spectral width is
spectral center is
208
W. X. Zhang et al.
is:
(
C f
)
=
1
2
πσ
f
exp
)2
(
−
f
f
−
2
σ
f
0
2
(7)
According to the Wiener filter theory, if the clutter is a stationary stochastic
process, its power spectrum and autocorrelation function are Fourier transform
(
cr m n is the Fourier
pairs. Therefore, the clutter autocorrelation function
transform of its power spectrum
(
)C f
(
)
C f e
(
r m n
,
c
.
(
t
t
−
m n
df
f
2
π
=
+∞
)
)
,
)
j
∫
∫
=
−∞
+∞
−∞
1
2
πσ
f
exp
(
−
f
f
−
2
2
σ
0
f
2
)
e
j
f
2
π
(
t
t
−
m n
)
df
(8)
t
m
τ =
mn
then
− is the relevant time. If the center of the clutter spectrum is zero,
t
n
(
cr m n
,
)
2 2
2
−=
e πσ τ
2
f mn
(9)
We obtain the clutter autocorrelation matrix A of N pulses
N
N
1,
)
(
0,0
(
)
1,0
−
(
0,
(
1,
=
(
r N
c
(
r N
c
)
1,1
r
c
r
c
r
c
r
c
r
c
r
c
1,0
R
c
−
)
)
1
−
)
1
−
N
−
)
1
(10)
)
(
0,1
(
)
1,1
−
)
(
r N
c
(
S f
B
f , the Doppler spectrum
r
pressed as
of the target echo signal can be ex-
(
S f
)
−=
1
,
B
2
0 other
,
f
B
2
(11)
The target autocorrelation function is
(
r m n
,
s
)
=
=
B
/2
B
−
/2
1
∫
B
sin
2
π τ
f
mn
j
e
df
=
(
B
π τ
mn
B
π τ
mn
)
=
1,
0,
j
e
1
j
B
2
π τ
mn
m n
=
m n
≠
2
π τ
B
mn
/2
−
j
−
e
2
π τ
B
mn
/2
(12)
Assume that the clutter data and the target data of the N pulse MTI input are
respectively
C
=
(
c t
1
)
,
(
c t
2
S
=
(
s t
1
)
,
(
s t
2
)
)
,
,
(
c t
N
,
,
(
s t
N
)
)
T
T
(13)
(14)
Then the MTI output of the clutter power and signal power are
C
0
=
S
0
=
E w C
H
H
E w S
2
2
=
=
H
C w R w
i
c
H
S w R w
i
s
(15)
(16)
where
iC and
iS represent the clutter power and the signal power at the MTI
209
W. X. Zhang et al.
filter input, respectively, w is the weight vector of the FIR filter. According to
the definition of the improvement factor of the MTI filter
o
I
=
/
/
S
S
i
C C
i
(
sr m n know,
)
,
o
By
=
S
C
o
i
S C
i
o
×
=
H
S w R w
i
s
S
i
×
H
C
i
H
w R w
C w R w w R w
i
=
H
c
c
s
(17)
sR for the unit array, therefore,
I
=
H
w w
H
w R w
c
(18)
The characteristic equation of
λ=
n
R w
c
n
cR is
w
n
,
n
= (19)
0,1,
N
,
where
nw is the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue
nλ . Among them
λ λ
0
1
λ
n
In the eigenvalues of
cR , the subspace of the eigenvector corresponding to
the large eigenvalue is the subspace of the signal, and the main points of the
clutter are located in this subspace. The subspace of the eigenvector corres-
ponding to the small eigenvalue is the noise subspace. Since the noise subspace is
orthogonal to the signal subspace, the eigenvector B corresponding to the min-
0w of the MTI filter, this
imum eigenvalue
can suppress the clutter component to the greatest extent, which is the biggest
improvement factor [9].
0λ is taken as the weight vector
2.2. Stagger Repetition Frequency
In general, it is not possible to obtain a PRF that can meet the required ambi-
guous distance and Doppler coverage. Therefore, a method of stagger repetition
frequency is proposed. Stagger repetition frequency is a measure that can be
used to prevent blind influence [10].
If the radar uses N repetition frequencies, their repetition periods can be ex-
pressed as
K T
= ∆
1
K T
∆
=
2
(20)
1
2
T
r
T
r
T
rN
=
=
1/
1/
r
1
f
f
r
2
f
K T
∆
T∆ is the maximum convention period for [
1/
=
=
rN
N
T T
,
r
r
1
,
T
,
rN
2
]
, then the odds
ratio is:
T T
:
r
r
1
2
:
=
T
rN
:
K K
1
:
2
:
:
K
N
(21)
]
[
2
N
:
:
:
K
K K
1
is the stagger code, the ratio of the largest K value to the
minimum K value in the parametric code is called the maximum ratio r of
the azimuth cycle.
r
(22)
max
] [
/
K K
1
K K
1
K
K
=
[
]
:
:
:
:
:
:
N
N
2
2
If
iK is mutually different and satisfies Equation (22), then the first true
blind velocity corresponds to the Doppler frequency
bnf
.
210
W. X. Zhang et al.
bnf
=
1
T
∆
(23)
The average repetition period of the radar is
T
r
=
1 N
∑
N =
i
1
T
ri
=
K T
∆
av
(24)
avK is the mean of the difference. Therefore
K
av
=
T
r
T
∆
f
bn
=
T f
r bn
=
f
bn
f
r
(25)
=
K f
av
r
(26)
Because
f
r
=
1/
T
r
is the average radar repetition frequency, it is also called
avK for the blind expansion factor.
The coefficient of the MTI filter between the pulses is different for each pulse
of the three pulse canceller, so it is a time-varying filter. If the radar uses three
3T at one time, three sets of MTI filters work in
repetition frequencies
turn. The depth of the stagger MTI filter speed response notch is independent of
the form of the canceller and is independent of the pulse received in the radar
antenna beam and is related to the maximum ratio of the azimuth cycle. The
larger the maximum change ratio, the shallower the corresponding notch depth.
2T ,
1T ,
df
2.3. Optimization of Adaptive MTI Filter
of the motion clutter in the input
In the clutter region, the spectral center
signal is estimated to obtain the Doppler frequency
estimate of the center of
the clutter spectrum. And then estimate the spectral width B to obtain the es-
∧
timated value B
of the spectral width. Then we obtain the weight coefficient of
the multi-notch filter by using the obtained estimator
into the
feature vector method, and design the MTI filter with multi-notch. As shown in
Figure 3.
∧
and B
df
df
∧
First estimate the motion of the clutter spectrum center.
The radar suffers from narrowband clutter and noise that can be expressed as
(27)
( )
A t e
( )
u t
( )
n t
(
ω ϕ+
0
=
+
)
j
t
d
Input u(t)
Output
AMTI filter
The weight vector is
calculated by the feature
vector method
Spectral width estimation of
motion clutter spectrum
Motion clutter spectrum
center estimation
Figure 3. Optimization design of adaptive MTI filter.
211
is the amplitude,
( )n t
dω is the Doppler frequency of the clutter,
0ϕ is
is the additive noise. Noise is not related to clutter,
W. X. Zhang et al.
( )A t
the initial phase, and
and noise between different PRI is uncorrelated.
Delay the signal after a PRI
)
(
)
A t T e
=
( )u t
(
The correlation function of
( )
E u t u t T
r
and
)
−
(
u t T
r
(
R T
r
−
−
=
)
*
r
(
ω
d
j
(
t T
ϕ−
r
0
+
)
)
+
(
n t T
r
−
)
(28)
(
)r
u t T−
is
( )
(
E A t A t T
=
r
−
)
T
d r
j
e ω
(29)
Therefore, the center frequency estimate of the clutter spectrum is obtained
∧
f
d
=
1 arctan
T
2
π
r
Im
Re
∧
(
R T
r
∧
(
R T
r
)
)
(30)
After obtaining the center frequency of the clutter spectrum, the spectral
width estimation is performed by the integral method.
Combined with the Gauss spectrum, there are Gaussian power spectra
(
C f
)
=
P
c
1
2
πσ
f
exp
(
f
−
f
−
d
2
2
σ
f
)2
(31)
fσ is the frequency variance of the Gaussian power spectrum,
is the
cP is the corresponding power spectrum at
center of the power spectrum, and
zero Doppler frequency. According to the definition of half power points
f
∆
dB
3
According to the nature of Gaussian distribution, there are
2.355
σ
f
≅
df
.
{
P
µ σ
{
P
−
µ σ
{
P
−
µ σ
− < ≤ +
2
< ≤ +
3
< ≤ +
}
)
0.6826
1
= Φ − Φ − =
µ σ
}
)
(
0.9544
2
2
− Φ −
= Φ
=
µ σ
)
(
}
0.9974
3
3
− Φ − =
= Φ
µ σ
( )
1
( )
2
( )
3
x
x
x
(
(32)
Prior to the estimated spectrum as the center to both sides of the center
df
of the accumulated clutter power spectrum (corresponding to integration), to
3dBf∆
95.44% for the energy threshold, and then using the relationship between
of the spectral estimate Gauss. After obtain-
and
ing the estimated spectral center and estimating the spectrum width, the weight
coefficient of the filter is obtained by using the feature vector method.
fσ to the spectral width B
∧
∧
It is found that the power spectrum is the sum of their respective power spec-
tra for the stagger clutter of multiple Gaussian spectra. The autocorrelation
function should also have the sum of the corresponding multi-clutter compo-
nents. Thus, we can derive the weight coefficients of two or more notch filters to
design a multi-notch AMTI filter.
3. Simulation and Performance Analysis
In Figure 4, obviously, the frequency response of the single delay line canceller and
rf . The peak
the double delay line canceller changes cyclically, and the period is
0n ≥ . As
nf=
appears at
,
r
, and the zero value appears at
) (
1
f
2 r
=
+
n
2
(
)
f
f
212
20
0
-20
-40
-60
-80
B
d
-
e
s
n
o
p
s
e
r
e
d
u
t
i
l
p
m
A
-100
0
0.5
1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
s
t
l
o
V
-
e
s
n
o
p
s
e
r
e
d
u
t
i
l
p
m
A
0
0
0.5
1
W. X. Zhang et al.
single c
double
anceler
anceler
c
3.5
4
4.5
5
single c
double
anceler
anceler
c
3.5
4
4.5
5
1.5
2
3
Normalized frequency - f/fr
2.5
(a)
1.5
2
3
Normalized frequency - f/fr
2.5
(b)
Figure 4. Normalized frequency response of single delay line canceller and
double delay line supporter. (a) dB. (b) Volt.
can be seen from the figure, the double delay line canceller has a deeper notch
and a more flat passband response than a single delay line canceller.
In Figure 5, the frequency response is still cyclical when the T is equal. It can
be clearly seen from the figure that the notch depth is significantly enhanced
compared to the delay line canceller, the passband response is also more flat, and
the frequency of the notches can be set at the same time.
In Figure 6, it can be seen that the use of staggered repetition frequency can
greatly improve the first blind speed. The larger stagger ratio, the lighter the
213