CHAPTER 1 Introduction 
The  Standard  for  Portfolio  Management  –  Second  Edition,  has  been  significantly  expanded  from  the  original 
version. Starting with the basic original materials, two knowledge areas specific to managing portfolios have been 
added. 
Design of the Document 
The Standard for Portfolio Management is organized into two sections: 
•  Section  1:  Portfolio  Management  Overview,  Framework,  and  Processes.  This  section  provides  a 
basis for understanding Portfolio Management. There are three chapters in this section. 
o  Chapter 1: The introduction presents a basis for the standard. It defines what a portfolio is and 
discusses portfolio management, the interaction among project, program, and portfolio 
management, and presents an outline of the remaining document. 
o  Chapter 2: Portfolio Management Overview and Organization provides an overview of the 
process, describes stakeholder roles, and organization influences. 
o  Chapter 3: Portfolio Management Processes defines the two process groups: Aligning and 
Monitoring and Controlling and maps the portfolio knowledge areas to those. 
•  Section  2:  Portfolio  Management  Knowledge  Areas.  This  section  lists  the  portfolio  management 
processes  and  enumerates  the  inputs,  tools  and  techniques,  and  outputs  for  each  area.  Each  chapter 
focuses on a portfolio specific knowledge area. 
o  Chapter 4, Portfolio Governance, describes the processes involved in developing a structure for 
ensuring quality and oversight to the portfolio. The chapter consists of the following processes: 
a. 
b. 
c. 
d. 
e. 
f. 
g. 
h. 
i. 
j. 
Identify Components, 
Categorize Components, 
Evaluate Components, 
Select Components, 
Prioritize Components, 
Balance Portfolio, 
Communicate Portfolio Adjustment, 
Authorize Components, 
Review and Report Portfolio Performance, and 
Monitor Business Strategy Changes. 
o  Chapter 5, Portfolio Risk Management, describes the processes concerned with conducting risk 
management for portfolios. The chapter consists of the following processes: 
a. 
b. 
c. 
d. 
Identify Portfolio Risks, 
Analyze Portfolio Risks, 
Develop Portfolio Risk Responses, and 
Monitor and Control Portfolio Risks. 
 
 
1.1 Purpose of The Standard for Portfolio Management 
The primary purpose of The Standard for Portfolio Management is to describe generally recognized good 
practices associated with portfolio management. “Generally recognized” means that the knowledge and 
practices described are applicable to most portfolios most of the time, and that there is widespread consensus 
about their value and usefulness. This standard is an expansion of and companion to information already 
provided in A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Fourth Edition, The 
Standard for Program Management – Second Edition, and the Organizational Project Management Maturity 
Model (OPM3®) – Second Edition. As a foundational reference, this standard is neither intended to be 
comprehensive nor all-inclusive. 
This standard focuses on portfolio management as it relates to the disciplines of project and program 
management. Its application is intended for all types of enterprises (i.e., profit, nonprofit, and government). 
When the term “enterprise” is used here, it applies generally to these three types of enterprises. If any portion of 
this standard typically is applicable to only to a subset of these, the subset is identified. 
1.1.1 Audience for The Standard for Portfolio Management 
This  standard  provides  a  foundational  reference  for  anyone  interested  in  managing  a  portfolio  of  projects  and 
programs. This includes, but is not limited to: 
•  Senior executives making decisions about enterprise strategy, 
•  Management staff responsible for developing enterprise strategy or those making recommendations to 
senior executives, 
•  Portfolio managers, 
•  Researchers analyzing portfolio management, 
•  Members of a portfolio or program management office, 
•  Managers of project and program managers, 
•  Program managers, 
•  Project managers and other project team members, 
•  Consultants and other specialists in project, program, and portfolio management and related fields, 
•  Functional managers and process owners with resources in a portfolio, 
•  Customers and other stakeholders, and 
•  Educators teaching the management of portfolios and related subjects. 
1.2 What is a Portfolio? 
A portfolio is a collection of projects (temporary endeavors undertaken to create a unique product, service, or 
result) and/or programs (a group of related projects managed in a coordinated way to obtain benefits and control 
not  available  from  managing  them  individually) and other work  (such  as  maintenance on an initiative already 
complete) that are grouped together to facilitate the effective management of that work to meet strategic business 
objectives. These components of a portfolio are quantifiable; that is, they can be measured, ranked, and prioritized. 
A portfolio always exists within an organization and it consists of a set of current components and planned 
or future initiatives. Therefore, portfolios are not temporary like projects or programs. Proposed initiatives 
become part of the portfolio when they are selected and approved. 
At any given moment, the portfolio represents a view of its selected components and reflects the strategic 
goals of the organization; however, specific projects or programs within the portfolio are not necessarily 
interdependent or directly related. By reflecting investments made or planned by an organization, the portfolio 
is where priorities are identified, investment decisions made, and resources allocated. Therefore, the portfolio 
represents the work selected to be done, but not necessarily the work that should be done. If a portfolio’s 
components are not aligned to its organizational strategy, the organization can reasonably question why the 
work is being undertaken. Therefore, a portfolio is a true measure of an organization’s intent, direction, and 
progress. 
1.2.1 Portfolios vs. Programs vs. Projects 
All components of a portfolio exhibit certain common features: 
•  They represent investments made or planned by the organization. 
•  They are aligned with the organization’s strategic goals and objectives. 
•  They typically have some distinguishing features that permit the organization to group them for more 
effective management. 
•  The components of a portfolio are quantifiable; they can be measured, ranked, and prioritized. 
Figure 1-1 illustrates the relationship of a portfolio and its components. 
Figure 1-1. Portfolio Relationships—Example 
A portfolio focuses on ensuring programs and projects are considered in relation to one another so resources 
(e.g., people, funding) can be allocated in alignment to and consistent with organizational priorities. Programs 
focus on achieving the benefits expected from the portfolio as determined by strategic organizational objectives. 
Projects are largely concerned with achieving specific deliverables that support narrowly defined objectives. 
The components of a portfolio can be further differentiated as shown in Table 1-1. 
 
Table 1-1. Comparison of Project, Program, and Portfolio Attributes 
 
 
1.3 What Is Portfolio Management? 
Portfolio  management  is  the  centralized  management  of  portfolio  components  to  achieve  specific  business 
objectives. While this standard focuses on “project portfolio management,” it is referred to throughout as simply 
“portfolio management.” 
Portfolio management is also an opportunity for a governing body to make decisions that control or 
influence the direction of a group of components (a sub-portfolio, program, projects, or other work) as they 
work to achieve specific outcomes. It uses the tools and techniques described in this standard to identify, select, 
prioritize, govern, measure, and report the contributions of the components to, and their relative alignment with, 
organizational objectives. It is not concerned with managing the components. The goal of portfolio management 
is to ensure that the organization is “doing the right work,” rather than “doing work right.” 
1.4 The Link between Portfolio Management and Organizational Governance 
Organizations  have  governance  frameworks  in  place  to  guide  the  execution  of  organizational  activities. 
Organizational governance establishes the limits of power, rules of conduct, and protocols that organizations use 
to  manage  progress  towards  the  achievement  of  their  strategic  goals.  This  is  accomplished  through  controls 
intended  to  maximize  the  delivery  of  value  while  minimizing  risk.  For  the  purposes  of  this  standard, 
organizational governance is the process by which an organization directs and controls its operations and strategic 
activities,  and  by  which  the  organization  responds  to  the  legitimate  rights,  expectations,  and  desires  of  its 
stakeholders.  Project  portfolio  governance  is  the  process  by  which  an  organization  prioritizes,  selects,  and 
allocates limited internal resources to best accomplish organizational objectives. 
Portfolio management is one discipline within organizational governance. Organizations that do not link 
portfolio management to governance risk misaligned or low priority initiatives which will consume critical 
resources. Therefore, applying the techniques of portfolio management within the context of organizational 
governance provides reasonable assurance that the organizational strategy can be achieved. 
Portfolio management is both a framework and a management activity. The framework directs the activity 
of translating the organizational strategy into a portfolio of strategic and operational initiatives. The 
management activity ensures actualization of those initiatives through the use of organizational resources. 
Figure 1-2 illustrates the relationships between organizational governance, operational management, and 
management of initiatives that comprise the portfolio. Governance principles ensure alignment between the 
resulting activities and the organizational strategy. 
In this figure, the controls that comprise organizational governance cascade to the domains of portfolio, 
program, and project management. As the portfolio is executed, these controls are applied to maximize the 
likelihood of the organization’s strategy. Managing these controls against the portfolio is the responsibility of 
the portfolio manager, whose role is detailed in Chapter 1, Section 8. The processes that guide execution of 
portfolio governance are discussed in Chapter 4. 
Figure 1-2. Relationships among Organizational Governance, Operations, and Portfolio Management 
1.5 The Relationship between Portfolio Management and Organizational Strategy 
Organizations build strategy to define how their vision will be achieved. The vision is enabled by the mission, 
which directs the execution of the strategy. For the purposes of this standard, organizational strategy is a plan that 
describes how the company’s strengths and core competencies will be used to: 
 
•  Capitalize on opportunities, 
•  Minimize the impact of threats, 
•  Respond to changes in the market, and 
•  Reinforce focus on critical operational activities. 
 
The goal of linking portfolio management to the strategy is to balance the use of resources to maximize 
value in executing strategic and operational activities. 
The organizational strategy is a result of the strategic planning cycle, where the vision and mission are 
translated into a strategic plan. The strategic plan is subdivided into a set of initiatives that are influenced by 
market dynamics, customer and partner requests, shareholders, government regulations, and competitor plans 
and actions. These initiatives establish strategic and operational portfolios to be executed in the planned period. 
Figure 1.3 depicts a general relationship between the strategic and operational processes in an organization. 
 
Figure 1-3. The Organizational Context of Portfolio Management 
“Vision,” “Mission,” and “Organizational Strategy and Objectives” illustrate the components used to set the 
organization’s performance targets. “High-Level Operations Planning and Management” and “Project Portfolio 
Planning and Management” establish the distinct initiatives required to achieve the organization’s performance 
targets. “Management of On-Going Operations” and “Management of Authorized Programs and Projects” 
correspond to executing the operational, program, and project activities to realize the organization’s 
performance targets. 
The shaded section, “Project Portfolio Planning and Management,” depicts the relationship between 
organizational strategy, strategic planning, and management activities. This relationship is highlighted due to 
the traditional focus of portfolio management on strategic project planning. To guide the “Management of 
Authorized Programs and Projects,” a strategic project portfolio is created. This strategic portfolio, which links 
the organizational strategy to a set of prioritized programs and projects, addresses the relevant internal and 
external business drivers referenced as objectives in the strategic plan. 
The ultimate goal of linking portfolio management with organizational strategy is to establish a balanced, 
executable plan that will help the organization achieve its goals. The impact of the portfolio plan upon strategy 
is attained by the four areas shown below: 
1.  Maintaining portfolio alignment. Each component should be aligned to one or more strategic goals. 
Alignment cannot occur without a clear understanding of those goals, and any proposal would describe 
how it supports the goals. 
2.  Allocating financial resources. The priority of each component guides financial allocation decisions, 
while at the same time each component requires an allocation if it is to be executed. 
3.  Allocating human resources. The priority of each component guides resource planning, hiring efforts, 
and time and skill allocations. 
4.  Measuring  component  contributions.  If  the  purpose  of  undertaking  the  component  is  to  achieve  a 
strategic goal, its contribution must be measured in the context of that goal. 
1.6 The Relationship between Portfolio, Program and Project Management 
A portfolio has a parent-child relationship with its components, just as a program has a parent-child relationship 
with  its  projects.  The  components  are  managed  according  to  frameworks,  such  as  A  Guide  to  the  Project 
Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Fourth Edition and The Standard for Program Management 
– Second Edition, and are periodically measured to gauge the likelihood of the components achieving their goals. 
Portfolio  management  evaluates  the  components  according  to  its  own  management  processes,  such  as  the 
Selection and Portfolio Balancing processes detailed later in this standard. 
When considering portfolio governance, the roles of executive, portfolio, program, project, and operations 
management are all interrelated. These relationships are shown in Figure 1-4. In smaller organizations, the roles 
of the executive and portfolio management may be combined into one. 
Figure 1-4. Cross-Company Portfolio Management Process Relationships 
 
1.7 The Link between Portfolio Management and Operations Management 
Portfolio management interacts with and impacts a number of organizational functions. Functional groups can be 
stakeholders in the portfolio and can also serve as sponsors of various components. The achievement of portfolio 
objectives may impact functional groups within an organization in their daily operations. Moreover, an operational 
budget  may  be  influenced  by  portfolio  management  decisions,  including  allocation  of  resources  to  support 
portfolio components. 
“Operations” is a term used to describe day-to-day organizational activities. The organization’s operations 
may include production, manufacturing, finance, marketing, legal, information services, human resources, and 
administrative services to name just a few. 
Processes and deliverables used by operational management are often outputs of the portfolio components. 
Therefore, the portfolio team must manage relationships and interfaces with operations effectively if the full 
value of each component is to be realized. 
1.7.1 The Link between Portfolio Management and Operational Projects 
Operational projects are often as critical as strategic projects, and are translated into a distinct portfolio defined in 
the area of Figure 1-3 labeled “High–Level Operations Planning and Management.” This portfolio encompasses 
the work executed in “Management of On-Going Operations.” 
The portfolio of operational projects links that subset of recurring activities managed as projects to the 
organizational strategy. As operational projects are delivered, the organization will have a solid foundation on 
which to execute strategic components. 
Therefore, the outputs from the areas in Figure 1-3 labeled “High-Level Operations Planning and 
Management” and “Project Portfolio Planning and Management” are portfolios that guide program and project 
activities in the planned period. This idea is expanded upon in Figure 1-5. As the components move into 
initiation, the respective areas use their management processes to manage deliveries. As they are executed, 
portfolio management maintains the relationships among components to measure progress and maintain 
alignment with strategic goals. Therefore, at the highest level the strategic and operational portfolios are 
ultimately managed as a single, comprehensive portfolio of work being undertaken by the organization. 
Figure 1-5 details the logical flow from strategy definition to comprehensive project portfolio creation. 
Figure 1-5. Building a Comprehensive Project Portfolio