2005 广东考研英语一真题及答案
Section I
Directions:
Use of English
Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark
[A], [B], [C] or [D] on ANSWER SHEET 1 (10 points)
The human nose is an underrated tool. Humans are often thought to be insensitive
smellers compared with animals, ___1___ this is largely because, ___2___ animals,
we stand upright. This means that our noses are ___3___ to perceiving those smells
which float through the air, ___4___ the majority of smells which stick to surfaces.
In fact, ___5___, we are extremely sensitive to smells, ___6___ we do not generally
realize it. Our noses are capable of ___7___ human smells even when these are ___8___
to far below one part in one million.
Strangely, some people find that they can smell one type of flower but not another,
___9___ others are sensitive to the smells of both flowers. This may be because some
people do not have the genes necessary to generate ___10___ smell receptors in the
nose. These receptors are the cells which sense smells and send ___11___ to the brain.
However, it has been found that even people insensitive to a certain smell ___12___
can suddenly become sensitive to it when ___13___ to it often enough.
The explanation for insensitivity to smell seems to be that the brain finds it
___14___ to keep all smell receptors working all the time but can ___15___ new
receptors if necessary. This may ___16___ explain why we are not usually sensitive
to our own smells—we simply do not need to be. We are not ___17___ of the usual
smell of our own house, but we ___18___ new smells when we visit someone else’s.
The brain finds it best to keep smell receptors ___19___ for unfamiliar and emergency
signals ___20___ the smell of smoke, which might indicate the danger of fire.
1.
[A] although
[B] as
[C] but
[D] while
2.
[A] above
[B] unlike
[C] excluding
[D] besides
3.
[A] limited
[B] committed
[C] dedicated
[D] confined
4.
[A] catching
[B] ignoring
[C] missing
[D] tracking
5.
[A] anyway
[B] though
[C] instead
[D] therefore
6.
[A] even if
[B] if only
[C] only if
[D] as if
7.
[A] distinguishing
[B] discovering
[C] determining
[D] detecting
8.
[A] diluted
[B] dissolved
[C] dispersed
[D] diffused
9.
[A] when
[B] since
[C] for
[D] whereas
10.
[A] unusual
[B] particular
[C] unique
[D] typical
11.
[A] signs
[B] stimuli
[C] messages
[D] impulses
12.
[A] at first
[B] at all
[C] at large
[D] at times
13.
[A] subjected
[B] left
[C] drawn
[D] exposed
14.
[A] ineffective
[B] incompetent
[C] inefficient
[D] insufficient
15.
[A] introduce
[B] summon
[C] trigger
[D] create
16.
[A] still
[B] also
[C] otherwise
[D] nevertheless
17.
[A] sure
[B] sick
[C] aware
[D] tired
18.
[A] tolerate
[B] repel
[C] neglect
[D] notice
19.
[A] available
[B] reliable
[C] identifiable
[D] suitable
20.
[A] similar to
[B] such as
[C] along with
[D] aside from
Reading Comprehension
Section II
Part A
Directions:
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing [A],
[B], [C] or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1 (40 points)
Text 1
Everybody loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn
that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for
slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as “all too human,”
with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely
developed sense of grievance. But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory
University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests
that it is all too monkey, as well.
The researchers studied the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys. They look
cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food
readily. Above all, like their female human counterparts, they tend to pay much
closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males.
Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr. Brosnan’s and Dr. de Waal’
s study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens
for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for
slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining
chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its
rock, their behaviour became markedly different.
In the world of capuchins, grapes are luxury goods (and much preferable to cucumbers).
So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was
reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape
without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her
own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice
of cucumber. Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber (without an
actual monkey to eat it) was enough to induce resentment in a female capuchin.
The researchers suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social
emotions. In the wild, they are a co-operative, group-living species. Such
co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being
cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems, are not the preserve of people
alone. Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear
to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved
independ ently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems from the common ancestor
that the species had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question.
opening
21.
________________________.
paragraph,
introduces
In
the
topic
by
the
author
his
[A] posing a contrast
[B] justifying an assumption
[C] making a comparison
[D] explaining a phenomenon
The statement “it is all too monkey” (Last line, Paragraph l) implies that
22.
________________________.
[A] monkeys are also outraged by slack rivals
[B] resenting unfairness is also monkeys’ nature
[C] monkeys, like humans, tend to be jealous of each other
[D] no animals other than monkeys can develop such emotions
Female capuchin monkeys were chosen for the research most probably because they
23.
are ________________________.
[A] more inclined to weigh what they get
[B] attentive to researchers’ instructions
[C] nice in both appearance and temperament
[D] more generous than their male companions
Dr. Brosnan and Dr. de Waal have eventually found in their study that the monkeys
24.
________________________.
[A] prefer grapes to cucumbers
[B] can be taught to exchange things
[C] will not be co-operative if feeling cheated
[D] are unhappy when separated from others
25.
What can we infer from the last paragraph?
[A] Monkeys can be trained to develop social emotions.
[B] Human indignation evolved from an uncertain source.
[C] Animals usually show their feelings openly as humans do.
[D] Cooperation among monkeys remains stable only in the wild.
Text 2
Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us
but the doubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure? That the evidence was
inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy
our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans
bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early
graves.
There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one wave after another try
to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. The latest was a panel from
the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the White House, to tell us that the
Earth’s atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made.
The clear message is that we should get moving to protect ourselves. The president
of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key point in the preface to the
panel’s report: “Science never has all the answers. But science does provide us
with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical that our nation and
the world base important policies on the best judgments that science can provide
concerning the future consequences of present actions.”
Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insisting that the science
about global warming is incomplete, that it’s OK to keep pouring fumes into the
air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: by the time 100 percent of
the evidence is in, it may be too late. With the risks obvious and growing, a prudent
people would take out an insurance policy now.
Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay attention. But it’s obvious that
a majority of the president’s advisers still don’t take global warming seriously.
Instead of a plan of action, they continue to press for more research -- a classic
case of “paralysis by analysis.”
To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must press forward on deeper
atmospheric and oceanic research. But research alone is inadequate. If the
Administration won’t take the legislative initiative, Congress should help to begin
fashioning conservation measures. A bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West
Virginia, which would offer financial incentives for private industry, is a
promising start. Many see that the country is getting ready to build lots of new
power plants to meet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the atmosphere,
it is crucial that those new plants be environmentally sound.
26.
An argument made by supporters of smoking was that ________________________.
[A] there was no scientific evidence of the correlation between smoking and death
[B] the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades was insignificant
[C] people had the freedom to choose their own way of life
[D] antismoking people were usually talking nonsense
27.
According to Bruce Alberts, science can serve as ________________________.
[A] a protector
[B] a judge
[C] a critic
[D] a guide
What does the author mean by “paralysis by analysis” (Last line, Paragraph
28.
4)?