第1页 / 共32页
第2页 / 共32页
第3页 / 共32页
第4页 / 共32页
第5页 / 共32页
第6页 / 共32页
第7页 / 共32页
第8页 / 共32页
c060341_ISO_IEC_11179-5_2015.pdf
Foreword
Introduction
1 Scope
2 Conformance
2.1 Conformity for registries
2.1.1 Rules for a conforming registry
2.1.2 Rules for a strictly conforming registry
2.2 Conformity for systems
2.2.1 Rules for a conforming system
2.2.2 Rules for a strictly conforming system
3 Normative references
4 Terms and definitions
5 The relationship of names and identifiers within a registry
6 Names
7 Naming conventions
8 Classes in the metamodel
8.1 Namespace class
8.1.1 Relationship of scoped identifiers and names
8.1.2 Uniqueness
8.2 Naming convention class
9 Development of naming conventions
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Scope principle
9.3 Authority principle
9.4 Semantic principle
9.5 Syntactic principle
9.6 Lexical principle
9.7 Uniqueness principle
10 Concept system relationship to names
10.1 Concepts as higher-level classes
10.2 Concepts as classification system
Annex A (informative) Example naming conventions for names within an MDR registry
Annex B (informative) Example naming conventions for Asian languages
Annex C (informative) Concordance table for item names
Bibliography
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
ISO/IEC
11179-5
Third edition
2015-04-01
Part 5:
Information technology — Metadata
registries (MDR) —
Naming principles
Technologies de l’information — Registres de métadonnées (RM) —
Partie 5: Principes de dénomination
Reference number
ISO/IEC 11179-5:2015(E)
© ISO/IEC 2015
ISO/IEC 11179-5:2015(E)
COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
© ISO/IEC 2015
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii
© ISO/IEC 2015 – All rights reserved
ISO/IEC 11179-5:2015(E)
1
2
Contents
Page
Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................iv
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v
Scope .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
Conformance .............................................................................................................................................................................................................1
Conformity for registries ................................................................................................................................................................1
2.1
Rules for a conforming registry ..........................................................................................................................1
2.1.1
2.1.2
Rules for a strictly conforming registry .......................................................................................................1
2.2
Conformity for systems ...................................................................................................................................................................2
Rules for a conforming system.............................................................................................................................2
2.2.1
Rules for a strictly conforming system .........................................................................................................2
2.2.2
Normative references ......................................................................................................................................................................................2
Terms and definitions .....................................................................................................................................................................................3
The relationship of names and identifiers within a registry .................................................................................6
Names ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................6
Naming conventions ..........................................................................................................................................................................................7
Classes in the metamodel ............................................................................................................................................................................7
Namespace class ....................................................................................................................................................................................7
8.1
Relationship of scoped identifiers and names .......................................................................................7
8.1.1
Uniqueness............................................................................................................................................................................7
8.1.2
8.2
Naming convention class ................................................................................................................................................................8
Development of naming conventions ..............................................................................................................................................8
Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................................................8
9.1
9.2
Scope principle........................................................................................................................................................................................9
9.3
Authority principle ..............................................................................................................................................................................9
Semantic principle ...............................................................................................................................................................................9
9.4
Syntactic principle ...............................................................................................................................................................................9
9.5
Lexical principle .....................................................................................................................................................................................9
9.6
9.7
Uniqueness principle .........................................................................................................................................................................9
Concept system relationship to names .......................................................................................................................................10
10.1 Concepts as higher-level classes ...........................................................................................................................................10
10.2 Concepts as classification system ........................................................................................................................................10
Annex A (informative) Example naming conventions for names within an MDR registry ........................11
Annex B (informative) Example naming conventions for Asian languages ...............................................................21
Annex C (informative) Concordance table for item names .........................................................................................................24
Bibliography .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................25
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
© ISO/IEC 2015 – All rights reserved
iii
ISO/IEC 11179-5:2015(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical
Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National bodies that are
members of ISO or IEC participate in the development of International Standards through technical
committees established by the respective organization to deal with particular fields of technical
activity. ISO and IEC technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO and IEC, also take part in the
work. In the field of information technology, ISO and IEC have established a joint technical committee,
ISO/IEC JTC 1.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for
the different types of document should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject
of patent rights. ISO and IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction
and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity
assessment, as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the WTO principles in the Technical Barriers
to Trade (TBT), see the following URL: Foreword — Supplementary information.
The committee responsible for this document is ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology, SC 32, Data
Management and Interchange.
This third edition cancels and replaces the second edition (ISO/IEC 11179-5:2005), which has been
technically revised.
ISO/IEC 11179 consists of the following parts, under the general title Information Technology — Metadata
registries (MDR):
— Part 1: Framework
— Part 2: Classification
— Part 3: Registry metamodel and basic attributes
— Part 4: Formulation of data definitions
— Part 5: Naming principles
— Part 6: Registration
iv
© ISO/IEC 2015 – All rights reserved
Introduction
ISO/IEC 11179-5:2015(E)
This part of ISO/IEC 11179 contains both principles and rules. Principles establish the premises on which
the rules are based. Registry users may enforce rules as an application of this part of ISO/IEC 11179.
A naming convention is a convention (a set of rules) about names. Many naming conventions have much
in common, whether it is defining a method of specifying names for common usage across application
systems, or developing an organization’s internal policy on the choice of XML tags for data interchange.
A naming convention may be based on principles. In addition, it may contain formal and informal inputs,
such as guidelines, recommendations, company policies, programming conventions, specifications,
procedures, and so on. The purpose of this part of ISO/IEC 11179 is to describe and specify these common
features of naming conventions. This part of ISO/IEC 11179 is intended to have broad applicability,
including areas outside of Metadata Registries.
The goal of any naming convention is to allow development of names for items that have maximum clarity
and transparency of meaning, combined with concision, demanding minimal effort of interpretation by
the end user, subject to the constraints of the system under which the items are processed. A naming
convention can be used to form names by which information about the data is expressed, in a simplified
but still understandable grammar compared to natural language rules. Ideally, the names resemble
summaries of the formal definition of the information being named.
In a metadata registry, one name may be designated as the “registry name,” derived by describing the
content of a metadata item in a structured way, using a set of rules, i.e. by application of a formalized naming
convention. Other names for the same metadata entity may occur in any context. For example, these may be
— software system names,
— programming language names,
— report header names,
— data interchange (e.g. XML) names, and
— names in other natural languages.
Names may have varying levels of rigor applied to their formation and usage. The collection and display of
all names used by any single metadata item can be a major benefit of a metadata registry. The process of
deriving names from concept systems and arranging semantic components with a naming convention forms
a set of consistent, meaningful registry names. Names from other contexts, which may or may not have
been formed with naming conventions, and therefore may have little or no semantic content, are collected
and related to the registry name, thus, contributing in a valuable way to enterprise data management.
Edition 3 of ISO/IEC 11179-3 uses the term designation in reference to most metamodel items except
for the classes Namespace and Naming Convention. The designations for these classes were adopted in
deference to commonly accepted usage. This part of ISO/IEC 11179 will continue to use the term name
for constructs that, for purposes of this part of ISO/IEC 11179, are interchangeable with designation.
NOTE
Items from the metamodel described in Edition 3 of ISO/IEC 11179-3 are italicized in this part of
ISO/IEC 11179. Most multi-word designations also contain underscores between words in ISO/IEC 11179-3; the
underscores have been omitted in this part of ISO/IEC 11179 for readability.
The naming principles and rules described in this part of ISO/IEC 11179 apply primarily to names of
concepts, data element concepts, conceptual domains, data elements, and value domains, but can be
extended to any registry content. Differing naming conventions may be applied to different sets of
designatable items. This part of ISO/IEC 11179 should be used in conjunction with those which establish
rules and procedures for attributing, classifying, defining, and registering items1).
1)
Refer to 11179-6 Ed. 3 for a discussion of identification.
© ISO/IEC 2015 – All rights reserved
v
ISO/IEC 11179-5:2015(E)
This part of ISO/IEC 11179 may be used for applications that are unrelated to ISO/IEC 11179-3, i.e. this
part of ISO/IEC 11179 has broad applicability for use in describing naming conventions for almost any
need or purpose. The same principles apply.
In Annex A, all of the examples are given with English terminologies. However, there is an intention that
those rules be effective in other natural languages, even in those languages that use ideographs such as
Japanese, Chinese, or Korean, when the terminologies used in the name are controlled properly. Annex B
contains a version of the rules for Asian languages.
It is out of scope of the naming rules to establish semantic equivalence of names among different
languages. Naming must be supplemented by other methods such as ontologies or controlled vocabularies
in establishing semantic equivalence.
This part of ISO/IEC 11179 may be applied to ISO/IEC 11179-3, i.e. describing naming conventions
associated with designations of designatable items and other features of the metamodel. The following
are examples of designations in the metamodel: the designation of a data element (class name:
Designation; attribute: sign); the designation of classification scheme name; etc. Annex C contains a
Concordance Table relating items in this part of ISO/IEC 11179 to items in ISO/IEC 11179-3.
This part of ISO/IEC 11179 does not make requirements on any specific set of conventions, e.g. specific
semantic, syntactic, or lexical requirements for names.
vi
© ISO/IEC 2015 – All rights reserved
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
ISO/IEC 11179-5:2015(E)
Naming principles
Information technology — Metadata registries (MDR) —
Part 5:
This part of ISO/IEC 11179 provides instruction for naming of the following items, as defined in
ISO/IEC 11179-3: concept, data element concept, conceptual domain, data element, and value domain.
This part of ISO/IEC 11179 describes naming in a metadata registries (MDR); includes principles and
rules by which naming conventions can be developed; and provides examples of naming conventions.
1 Scope
2 Conformance
2.1 Conformity for registries
2.1.1 Rules for a conforming registry
A registry containing a namespace associated with a set of designatable items which conform to naming
conventions so that:
— each item shall be named in accordance with a naming convention,
— each naming convention shall have its scope documented,
— each naming convention shall have its authority documented,
— each naming convention should have its semantic rules documented,
— each naming convention should have its syntactic rules documented,
— each naming convention should have its lexical rules documented, and
— each naming convention should have its uniqueness rules documented,
then that namespace is in conformance with this part of 11179.
A registry in which every namespace conforms to this part of 11179 is a conforming registry.
A registry containing a namespace associated with a set of designatable items which conform to naming
conventions so that:
— each item shall be named in accordance with a naming convention,
— each naming convention shall have its scope documented,
— each naming convention shall have its authority documented,
— each naming convention shall have its semantic rules documented,
— each naming convention shall have its syntactic rules documented,
— each naming convention shall have its lexical rules documented, and
© ISO/IEC 2015 – All rights reserved
2.1.2 Rules for a strictly conforming registry
1
ISO/IEC 11179-5:2015(E)
2
2.2 Conformity for systems
2.2.1 Rules for a conforming system
2.2.2 Rules for a strictly conforming system
— each naming convention shall have its uniqueness rules documented,
then that namespace is in strict conformance with this part of 11179.
A registry in which every namespace strictly conforms to this part of 11179 is a strictly conforming registry.
A system containing a namespace associated with a set of objects which conform to naming
conventions so that:
— each item shall be named in accordance with a naming convention,
— each naming convention shall have its scope documented,
— each naming convention shall have its authority documented,
— each naming convention should have its semantic rules documented,
— each naming convention should have its syntactic rules documented,
— each naming convention should have its lexical rules documented, and
— each naming convention should have its uniqueness rules documented,
then that namespace is in conformance with this part of 11179.
A system in which every namespace conforms to this part of 11179 shall be a conforming system.
A system containing a namespace associated with a set of objects which conform to naming
conventions so that:
— each item shall be named in accordance with a naming convention,
— each naming convention shall have its scope documented,
— each naming convention shall have its authority documented,
— each naming convention shall have its semantic rules documented,
— each naming convention shall have its syntactic rules documented,
— each naming convention shall have its lexical rules documented, and
— each naming convention shall have its uniqueness rules documented,
then that namespace is in strict conformance with this part of 11179.
A system in which every namespace strictly conforms to this part of 11179 shall be a strictly
conforming system.
The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are
indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
© ISO/IEC 2015 – All rights reserved
3 Normative references
相关推荐
2023年江西萍乡中考道德与法治真题及答案.doc
2012年重庆南川中考生物真题及答案.doc
2013年江西师范大学地理学综合及文艺理论基础考研真题.doc
2020年四川甘孜小升初语文真题及答案I卷.doc
2020年注册岩土工程师专业基础考试真题及答案.doc
2023-2024学年福建省厦门市九年级上学期数学月考试题及答案.doc
2021-2022学年辽宁省沈阳市大东区九年级上学期语文期末试题及答案.doc
2022-2023学年北京东城区初三第一学期物理期末试卷及答案.doc
2018上半年江西教师资格初中地理学科知识与教学能力真题及答案.doc
2012年河北国家公务员申论考试真题及答案-省级.doc
2020-2021学年江苏省扬州市江都区邵樊片九年级上学期数学第一次质量检测试题及答案.doc
2022下半年黑龙江教师资格证中学综合素质真题及答案.doc
